The Stoa Rulebook
The complete rules, ballots, standards, and script submission guidelines for every Stoa event, gathered in one place, so competitors, parents, coaches, and judges always know exactly what to expect and how to prepare.
Speech
Limited Prep, Platform, Interpretation, and Wildcard events.
Debate
Team Policy, Lincoln Douglas, and Parliamentary debate.
The Stoa Rulebook works like an app once it’s on your home screen: one tap to open, full screen, and the rules you’ve viewed keep working even with no signal at a tournament.
iPhone or iPad
- Open stoa-rulebook.netlify.app in Safari. (It has to be Safari. If you opened this link from another app, tap the “open in Safari” option first.)
- Tap the Share button (the square with an arrow pointing up, at the bottom of the screen).
- Scroll down and tap Add to Home Screen.
- Tap Add. The Rulebook icon appears on your home screen.
Android
- Open stoa-rulebook.netlify.app in Chrome.
- Tap the ⋮ menu (three dots, top right).
- Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
- Tap Install or Add. The Rulebook icon appears on your home screen.
On a computer, Chrome and Edge show an install icon at the right end of the address bar. You can also just bookmark the page.
The Debate Rulebook
Stoa’s three debate events.
Team Policy
Lincoln Douglas
Parliamentary
The Speech Rulebook
Every speech event, with its complete rules, ballot, standards, and script submission requirements.
Limited Prep
You draw a prompt in the room and build the speech on the spot. Nothing is submitted ahead of time; the preparation is in your research, your practice, and your thinking.
Extemporaneous
Impromptu
Apologetics
Mars Hill
Platforms
Written by the competitor, memorized, and delivered as written. A script and citation page are submitted at each tournament.
Original Oratory
Persuasive
Expository
Interps
A performance of literature brought to life. The script and pages from the original source are submitted and reviewed before you take the stage.
Literary Interpretation
Duo Interpretation
Open Interpretation
Wildcards
Rotating events offered for the 2026-2027 season. Each wildcard carries its own preparation and submission requirements, found in its rules.
Storytelling
Slam Poetry
Apologetics
Last updated August 30, 2026
The competitor is given four (4) minutes to prepare a persuasive, reasoned, and original speech that defends a tenet of the Christian faith.
Competitors will be motivated to study, articulate, and defend the core issues of their faith in a knowledgeable, sincere, and respectful manner. The focus may or may not be evangelistic. The audience’s acceptance of the truth of the Bible should not be assumed. Content outweighs delivery: greater weight should be given to the speech content rather than the presentation style.
Preparation Time – Four (4) Minutes. Speaking time – Six (6) Minutes.
1Preparation Rules
Why these rules existAdhering to the Prompt: Circumventing the prompt to make the subject matter easier for the student is an unfair competitive advantage, as the student is speaking on a topic they are more comfortable with rather than the chosen topic.
Oral Citations: Students are required to cite the source(s) they are using orally. Falsifying sources or material or taking credit for another’s research or analysis is unethical.
- All questions/topics must come from the Apologetics Questions list on the Stoa website.
- Topics for each individual round must be entirely from one category published on the Stoa website.
- Competitors prepare for Apologetics through Bible study, research, analysis, and organization.
- Each competitor may create a file of note cards (no larger than 4” x 6”) with Scripture, definitions, quotations, and any other helpful material.
- Competitors may not share card files during competition.
2026-2027 Apologetics QuestionsSix categories · tap to expand▾
“...but in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect (1 Peter 3:15, ESV).
Stoa Apologetics is designed to help students understand the core issues of their faith. Students will craft a response considering their audience may or may not accept the Bible as truth. The speech is not intended to be a sermon, nor is it necessarily a presentation of the Gospel or an overtly evangelistic opportunity. Therefore, the presentation should be a thoughtful response to the question/topic and the reason(s) why it is important for theological truth and Christian living.
* New Questions
Category 1: Nature of God
- What does it mean that God is triune? Why is this important?
- What does it mean that God is omniscient? Why is this important?
- What does it mean that God is omnipresent? Why is this important?
- What does it mean that God is immutable? Why is this important?
- What is the meaning of the sovereignty of God? Why is this important?
- Christians often argue for God’s existence by suggesting the universe needs an initial cause. But what caused God?
- What evidence is there for the existence of God in our physical universe?
- Respond to the critique: “God the Holy Spirit is just the manifestation of God’s divine power.”
- Is it important to speak of God in masculine pronouns? Why or why not?
- How could a loving God send man to hell?
- How can God be both merciful and just?
- If God is omnipotent and holy, how could He allow so much sin and suffering in the world?
- Compare and contrast the Muslim view of God with the Christian view of God.
- *Respond to the statement: “Evolution disproves the existence of God.”
Category 2: Nature of Man
- *How does the Bible describe man’s sinful condition before God?
- What do secular theories of human origins get right and wrong about human nature?
- Can morality exist without God?
- Explain what is meant by the statement: “God hates the sin but loves the sinner.”
- When does human life begin? Why is this important?
- Respond to the statement by St. Augustine: “You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you.” Augustine. Confessions. Translated by Henry Chadwick, Oxford UP, 1991, p. 3.
- Respond to someone who asks, “Is there judgment after death?”
- Compare and contrast the world’s view of identity with God’s view of identity.
- Is all human life valuable? If so, why?
- Compare and contrast the Hindu view of the nature of man with the Christian view of the nature of man.
- *Critique the statement by Ernest Hemingway: “All thinking men are atheists.” Hemingway, Ernest. A Farewell to Arms. Scribner, 1929.
- Respond to the critique: “Christians care more about ideology than people.”
- *In 1867, C.H. Spurgeon said, “It is a terribly easy matter to be a minister of the gospel and a vile hypocrite at the same time.” Why did he say this, and why is it still relevant today? Spurgeon, C. H. “An All-Important Question.” Spurgeon’s Sermons, Volume 52: 1906, Christian Classics Ethereal Library, ccel.org/ccel/spurgeon/sermons52/sermons52.xli.html. Originally delivered 13 Jan. 1867.
- *Respond to the statement: “I can’t believe in Christianity because of how the church hurt me.”
Category 3: Bible
- Why are the unity and the sufficiency of Scripture essential to the Christian faith?
- Respond to the critique: “The Bible is archaic and out of touch with our modern world. Why should I care what it says?”
- What does the inspiration of Scripture mean? Why is this important?
- Respond to someone claiming the Quran is the true word of God.
- How does the Book of Mormon compare to the Bible?
- Is the Bible historically reliable? Why is this important?
- Does science contradict the Bible?
- What does it mean that the Bible is inerrant? Why is this important?
- Does the Bible condone slavery?
- Respond to the statement: “The Bible is full of contradictions.”
- Respond to the statement: “The Bible is simply the work of a great conspiracy where people sought to create a religion of their own.”
- How did we get the biblical canon we have today, and how can we trust that it is truly the Word of God?
- Does God reveal Himself to man? If so, how?
- Respond to the statements: “There is no absolute truth. There is only your truth.”
Category 4: Jesus
- What does it mean that Jesus Christ is the Messiah? Why is this important?
- *Is there historical evidence for the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus?
- Why is it important that Jesus Christ is both fully God and fully man?
- Respond to the following: “Jesus said He would return soon. So, where is He?”
- What does it mean to call Jesus Christ the “Lamb of God”? Why is this important?
- What is the importance of the resurrection of Jesus?
- Why was Jesus known for associating with sinners? To what extent should Christians follow His example?
- What will happen to the people who have never heard about Jesus and the Gospel?
- Respond to the claim: “Jesus was a socialist.”
- In part, John 10:10 says, “I have come that they may have life and have it more abundantly.” What did Jesus mean?
- What does the virgin birth of Jesus Christ mean? Why is this important?
- *How does Jesus make Christianity distinct from all other religions of the world?
- *Respond to the statements: “It doesn’t matter if Jesus is taken literally. We can just appreciate His moral value.”
- *What do Mormons believe about Jesus?
Category 5: Salvation
- Compare and contrast justification with sanctification.
- What is redemption? Why is this important?
- What does it mean for man to repent from his sins? Why is this important?
- What is the grace of God? Why is this important?
- If Christians are saved by faith, why do works matter?
- What is the Gospel, and why is it the core of the Christian faith?
- What is the role of the Holy Spirit in salvation? Why is this important?
- How is it possible for an individual to have a personal relationship with the almighty God?
- Can a person do enough good in their life to get into heaven?
- Respond to the belief: “Everyone will be saved eventually because of God’s unconditional love.”
- *Paul Carus, in his narrative on Buddhist ethics, states, “No one saves us but ourselves. No one can and no one may. We ourselves must walk the path.” Respond to this statement. Karma: A Story of Buddhist Ethics. Chicago: Carus Publishing Co., 1984, p. 40.
- *Does the Bible give Christians assurance of their salvation?
- *Respond to the claim: “All religions are partially correct.”
- *What are the biblical descriptions of heaven and hell, and how are they different from other religious claims of the afterlife?
Category 6: Christian Life
- What does it mean to forgive? Why is this important?
- What is the importance of prayer?
- What does it mean to be holy? Why is this important?
- Respond to the critique: “The Christian faith is a blind faith.”
- Compare and contrast God’s view of marriage with the world’s view of marriage.
- Respond to a quote popularly attributed to Dwight L. Moody: “Church attendance is as vital to a disciple as a transfusion of rich, healthy blood to a sick man.”
- Respond to the Karl Marx quote: “Religion is the opium of the people.” Marx, Karl. “A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction.” Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher, 1844.
- Respond to the criticism: “Christianity is narrow-minded and dangerous.”
- Compare and contrast Scientology with Christianity.
- *Respond to the Michael Shermer quote: “Play hard, work hard, love hard. … The bottom line for me is to live life to the fullest in the here-and-now instead of a hoped-for hereafter.” Michael Shermer, quoted in Johnson, Chris. A Better Life: 100 Atheists Speak Out on Joy & Meaning in a World Without God. Cosmic Teapot, Inc., 2014.
- *What is the role of the Holy Spirit in a Christian’s life?
- *Can Christians doubt?
- *What is gender dysphoria and how does the Bible address it?
- *Critique the statement: “The church is just a manmade institution; I can follow Jesus without going to church.”
Stoa Apologetics Questions 2026-2027 · Revised 6/16/2026
2Presentation Rules
- The competitor must answer the selected topic and defend his/her position. The competitor must state the selected topic early in the speech and adhere to it.
- The question or topic should be approached from an apologetic perspective. It may or may not be an evangelistic opportunity.
- During the speech, the competitor may only hold note cards (no quantity limit) and the chosen topic slip.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during preparation time and/or delivery of the speech, other than specifically allowed preparation materials.
- The speech must be the original work of the competitor and should be supported by Scripture, quotations, personal narratives, and/or analysis from outside sources (e.g., commentaries, literature, news articles, testimonials etc.).
- When quoting information from an outside source, the source must be verbally cited during the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- Competitors must not listen to other Apologetics competitors speaking before them in the round.
- During the presentation, the timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is six (6) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by fifteen (15) seconds or more.
Preparation Time – Four (4) Minutes. Speaking time – Six (6) Minutes.
- Apologetics judges should be in agreement with Stoa’s Statement of Faith.
- One judge in each room will be given the topics to distribute to each competitor along with instructions regarding room administration.
- A list of possible topics will be given to each of the judges in the room.
- In the room, the competitor will draw three (3) single topics provided by the tournament, select one (1), and return the other two (2) topics before leaving the room. The selected topic should not be returned.
- Preparation time begins as soon as the competitor draws the first topic.
- During preparation time, the timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting down.
- During preparation time, the competitor may only use a Bible, access their card file, and/or prepare additional notecards. No electronic media is allowed.
- Unused preparation time may not be added to the speaking time.
Delivery
The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props
Presentation Rule #7: No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message. Stoa encourages authentic gestures and facial expressions in speech delivery. However, when a feature that is on or part of the student’s body or clothing, or in the competition room, is used to visually enhance the speech as support or evidence, it becomes a prop and is not permitted.
3Ballot
Apologetics
A limited prep speech that respectfully articulates and defends a tenet of the Christian faith
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Apologetics – Content Outweighs Delivery | ||
| Analysis: Explains the background of the topic. Provides researched defense of Biblical truth. | 1 5 | |
| Rhetoric: Credible and sincere connection with audience. Compelling and persuasive reasoning. Addresses audience that may or may not understand and/or accept Biblical truth. | 1 5 | |
| Impact: Demonstrates importance of topic. Promotes reflection. | 1 5 | |
| Structure | ||
| Organization: Relevant and engaging introduction. Clear thesis statement that answers the prompt. Organized content; smooth transitions. Effective conclusion. | 1 5 | |
| Language: Vocabulary; rhetorical devices/memorable language. | 1 5 | |
| Delivery | ||
| Vocal: Varies volume, rate, and inflection; is conversational. | 1 5 | |
| Physical: Authentic gestures and movement. | 1 5 | |
| Facial: Eye contact; appropriate facial expressions. | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised; professional. | 1 5 | |
| Manner: Compassionate; sincere; respectful. | 1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
This event has no script submission requirement. The rules below still apply.
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Speeches may not be written by AI, in part or in full. All Apologetics speeches must be “an original work written by the competitor.” The speech must be delivered in the student’s authentic and unique voice.
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
Common Knowledge
While many students have acquired knowledge through their studies and hobbies, not all of it is common to the average person. Thus, detailed knowledge must be cited. This includes dates, statistics, technical information, and facts that the listener would only know if they had researched the topic. When in doubt, cite the source. For more information, see the article from MIT titled “What Is Common Knowledge?”.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
- The competitor must answer the selected topic and defend his/her position. The competitor must state the selected topic early in the speech and adhere to it.
- The question or topic should be approached from an apologetic perspective. It may or may not be an evangelistic opportunity.
- During the speech, the competitor may only hold note cards (no quantity limit) and the chosen topic slip.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during preparation time and/or delivery of the speech, other than specifically allowed preparation materials.
- The speech must be the original work of the competitor and should be supported by Scripture, quotations, personal narratives, and/or analysis from outside sources (e.g., commentaries, literature, news articles, testimonials etc.).
- When quoting information from an outside source, the source must be verbally cited during the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- Competitors must not listen to other Apologetics competitors speaking before them in the round.
- During the presentation, the timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is six (6) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by fifteen (15) seconds or more.
Preparation Time – Four (4) Minutes. Speaking time – Six (6) Minutes.
- Apologetics judges should be in agreement with Stoa’s Statement of Faith.
- One judge in each room will be given the topics to distribute to each competitor along with instructions regarding room administration.
- A list of possible topics will be given to each of the judges in the room.
- In the room, the competitor will draw three (3) single topics provided by the tournament, select one (1), and return the other two (2) topics before leaving the room. The selected topic should not be returned.
- Preparation time begins as soon as the competitor draws the first topic.
- During preparation time, the timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting down.
- During preparation time, the competitor may only use a Bible, access their card file, and/or prepare additional notecards. No electronic media is allowed.
- Unused preparation time may not be added to the speaking time.
Impromptu
Last updated August 30, 2026
The competitor is given two (2) minutes to prepare a speech on a randomly drawn prompt.
To develop a winsome, polished speaker who can present an original, spontaneously prepared speech. The speaker may choose to approach the prompt in any way, but the prompt must be the central theme of the speech, not peripheral to it.
Preparation Time – Two (2) Minutes. Speaking Time – Five (5) Minutes.
1Preparation Rules
Why these rules existAdhering to the Prompt: Circumventing the prompt to make the subject matter easier for the student is an unfair advantage, as the student is speaking on a topic they are more comfortable with, rather than the chosen topic.
Spontaneous Speech: Pre-written speeches may not be used for this event as they compromise the purpose of intelligent, inventive speech and thought proceeding from the prompt during preparation time. Students who use a prepared speech have taken more than their allotted prep time to craft a compelling speech, which gives them an unfair advantage over students who are creating a speech in the moment.
- Prompts should be of the same type and format for all speakers in the round (e.g., all quotations, all short phrases, all words, or all abstract concepts, etc.).
- The speaker may not bring any prepared material into the room.
2Presentation Rules
- The speaker must state the chosen prompt early in the speech and adhere to the chosen prompt.
- During the speech, the competitor may only hold the chosen prompt. No audio or visual aids or props may be used.
- The speech must be the original work of the competitor, developed from one of the prompts given, and prepared on the spot.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during preparation time and/or delivery of the speech.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- Competitors must not listen to other Impromptu competitors speaking before them in the round.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is five (5) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by fifteen (15) seconds or more.
Preparation Time – Two (2) Minutes. Speaking Time – Five (5) Minutes.
- One judge in each room will be given the topics to distribute to each competitor along with instructions regarding room administration.
- A list of possible prompts will be given to each of the judges in the competition room.
- In the room, the competitor will draw three (3) single prompts provided by the tournament, select one (1), and return the other two (2) prompts before leaving the room. The selected prompt should not be returned.
- Preparation time begins as soon as the competitor draws the first prompt.
- During preparation time, the timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting down.
- During preparation time, the competitor may not use any electronic media or other sources to prepare the speech.
- The speaker may write notes on any blank paper/card except the prompt slip during preparation time. They may only hold the prompt while they speak.
- Unused preparation time may not be added to the speaking time.
Delivery
The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message. While the tournament may use props as prompts and give them to competitors to use during their speech, competitors may not use their own props in Impromptu. Stoa encourages authentic gestures and facial expressions in speech delivery. However, when a feature that is on or part of the student’s body or clothing, or in the competition room, is used to visually enhance the speech as support or evidence, it becomes a prop and is not permitted.
3Ballot
Impromptu
An original speech prepared in the moment, addressing a randomly drawn prompt
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Impromptu | ||
| Analysis: Keeps the prompt the central theme. Creates interest in the topic. Compelling illustrations and examples. Demonstrates on-the-spot thinking. | 1 5 | |
| Impact: Communicates theme and topic in a memorable way | 1 5 | |
| Content | ||
| Structure: States the prompt early. Relevant and engaging introduction. Clear thesis statement. Organized content; smooth transitions. Effective conclusion. | 1 5 | |
| Rhetoric: Builds credibility with the audience (ethos). Explains concepts using reason (logos). Evokes appropriate emotional response (pathos). | 1 5 | |
| Language: Vocabulary; rhetorical devices/memorable language | 1 5 | |
| Delivery | ||
| Vocal: Varies volume, rate, and inflection; conversational | 1 5 | |
| Physical: Authentic gestures and movement | 1 5 | |
| Facial: Eye contact; appropriate facial expressions | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised; professional Manner: Confident; sincere |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
This event has no script submission requirement. The rules below still apply.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
- The speaker must state the chosen prompt early in the speech and adhere to the chosen prompt.
- During the speech, the competitor may only hold the chosen prompt. No audio or visual aids or props may be used.
- The speech must be the original work of the competitor, developed from one of the prompts given, and prepared on the spot.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during preparation time and/or delivery of the speech.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- Competitors must not listen to other Impromptu competitors speaking before them in the round.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is five (5) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by fifteen (15) seconds or more.
Preparation Time – Two (2) Minutes. Speaking Time – Five (5) Minutes.
- One judge in each room will be given the topics to distribute to each competitor along with instructions regarding room administration.
- A list of possible prompts will be given to each of the judges in the competition room.
- In the room, the competitor will draw three (3) single prompts provided by the tournament, select one (1), and return the other two (2) prompts before leaving the room. The selected prompt should not be returned.
- Preparation time begins as soon as the competitor draws the first prompt.
- During preparation time, the timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting down.
- During preparation time, the competitor may not use any electronic media or other sources to prepare the speech.
- The speaker may write notes on any blank paper/card except the prompt slip during preparation time. They may only hold the prompt while they speak.
- Unused preparation time may not be added to the speaking time.
Extemporaneous
Last updated August 30, 2026
In Extemporaneous speaking, the competitor answers a given question based on recent events in the news. The competitor researches national and international current events and may create reference files of newsworthy information. Extemporaneous speech should be regarded as a demonstration of personal knowledge on the topic as well as an original synthesis of numerous sources.
To develop a well-informed student who can critically evaluate current issues by expressing his/her position on a given question. The speech should be the competitor’s original work and delivered with credible, pertinent, and sufficient evidence to support his/her position on the topic.
Preparation and Walk Time – Thirty (30) Minutes. Speaking Time – Seven (7) Minutes
1Preparation Rules
- In Extemporaneous (Extemp) speaking, the competitor, alone or as part of a club, prepares by researching national and international current events and may create reference files of newsworthy information including published articles, reference works, facts, data, and transcripts which may be stored and organized electronically or on hard copies.
- The speech must be an original work, prepared during the Extemp preparation time. Competitors may not bring pre-written speeches, outlines, or cards into the Extemp Preparation (Prep) Room. This includes, but is not limited to, research papers, debate cases, previous Extemp cards, etc.
- Competitors may only be in the Extemp Prep Room during their prep time.
- Competitors should arrive at the Extemp Prep Room before the beginning of their posted preparation time.
- Extemp prep time will not be extended if a competitor is late for their draw time. If a competitor is late to the Extemp Prep Room, they will have less time to prepare their speech and must still speak on schedule.
- In the Extemp Prep Room, the competitor will receive a set of three (3) topic questions which he/she may keep.
- During preparation time, the competitor may only use his/her offline reference files to prepare a single note card (3” x 5”) for presentation.
- Competitors have thirty (30) minutes of preparation time, which includes walking to and arriving at their competition room. Competitors are responsible for arriving at the competition room by the required speaking time.
- Each competitor must do their own work and must not communicate with others during their Extemp prep time.
- Access to the internet or outside information is prohibited from draw time through speech completion. WiFi must be turned off.
- Competitors may not use any electronic devices to communicate with anyone prior to the conclusion of their speech.
- Tournaments are not required nor expected to provide power sources for electronic devices.
- Competitors are responsible for the security of their electronic equipment, file boxes, and/or published media.
- All file boxes and/or electronic devices must be labeled with the name of the competitor and club.
- A competitor must not use another competitor’s or club’s files or electronic device(s) without the written permission of the coach or parent of the loaning competitor. This permission must be submitted in writing to the Extemp Room Proctor before the competitor uses the files and/or device(s). If computers are shared, open files must be closed before use by others. If hard copies are shared, they must be re-filed before being given to another competitor.
- Competitors are responsible for knowing and abiding by the Competitor Responsibilities.
2Presentation Rules
Circumventing the prompt to make the subject matter easier for the student is an unfair competitive advantage, as the student is speaking on a topic they are more comfortable with, rather than the chosen topic. Pre-written speeches may not be used for this event as they compromise the purpose of intelligent and inventive speech and thought, proceeding from the prompt during preparation time. Students using a prepared speech have taken more than their allotted prep time to craft a compelling speech, which gives them a competitive advantage over students creating a speech in the moment.
- The competitor must state the selected question early in the speech and answer the selected question. They will take a position on that question and support that position with analysis and outside evidence.
- Nothing may be used during the competitor’s speech other than one 3” x 5” card and the topic paper.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during preparation and/or delivery of the speech, other than specifically allowed preparation materials.
- When quoting information or data from an outside source, the source must be verbally cited during the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- No audio or visual aids or props may be used during the speech presentation.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- Competitors must not listen to other Extemporaneous competitors speaking before them in the round.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- Maximum speaking time is seven (7) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by fifteen (15) seconds or more.
Preparation and Walk Time – Thirty (30) Minutes. Speaking Time – Seven (7) Minutes.
Extemporaneous Preparation Room Rules
Note: The ‘Competitor Responsibilities’ section of this protocol is incorporated by reference into the event rules for Extemporaneous. (See prep rule #16.)
Tournament Responsibilities
- Questions are to address both national and international current events.
- Tournament Directors are to ensure a fair distribution and balance of the difficulty and types (national, international, economic, etc.) of Extemporaneous (Extemp) questions among the speakers for each round. See Guidelines for Writing Effective Extemp Questions.
- Various types of question formats may be used, including yes/no, open-ended questions, etc.
- Tournament Directors are to make sure the Extemp Proctor(s) is trained and aware of responsibilities.
- Copies of this Extemporaneous Preparation Room Protocol and the Extemporaneous Rules must be posted in the Extemp Preparation (Prep) Room.
- The Extemp Prep Room must have an official timepiece available to view by competitors.
- The tournament is not responsible for providing electrical power for electronic devices.
- Tournaments are required to post the competitor draw order and preparation times and speaking times.
Competitor Responsibilities
- Competitors must check in and check out of the Extemp Prep Room with a proctor.
- All file boxes and/or electronic devices must be labeled with the name of the competitor and/or club.
- A competitor must not use another competitor’s or club’s files or electronic device(s) without the written permission of the coach or parent of the loaning competitor. This permission must be submitted in writing to the Extemp Room Proctor before the competitor uses the files and/or device(s).
- If computers are shared, open files must be closed before use by others. If hard copies are shared, they must be re-filed before being given to another competitor.
- Competitors may only be in the Extemp Prep Room during their prep time and should expect to remain until dismissed by the Proctor.
- Each competitor must do their own work and must not ask for information from other competitors.
- Competitors may not use cell phones or any other electronic device to communicate with anyone prior to the conclusion of their speech. The use of headphones, earbuds, or similar devices during Extemp prep is not allowed.
- Competitors may not talk in the Extemp Prep Room.
- Competitors must put away files and clean up the prep area before leaving the Extemp Prep Room.
- All electronic device screens must be visible to the Proctor(s) at all times in the Extemp Prep Room.
- Speakers are timed to speak every 10 minutes. Competitors are expected to deliver their speech immediately at the end of their prep time in the posted order.
Proctor Responsibilities
- The Proctor(s) must have a copy of the Extemporaneous Rules and Extemporaneous Prep Room Protocol and read them before the tournament.
- The Proctor will go to the door of the Extemp Prep Room and call in students according to the posted draw times.
- Extemp prep time will not be extended if a competitor is late for their draw time. If a competitor is late to the Extemp Prep Room, they will have correspondingly less time to prepare their speech in order to speak on schedule.
- The Proctor will announce regular time reminders to the competitors.
- The Proctor(s) will actively monitor electronic devices and the competitors’ preparation materials to ensure adherence to the rules.
- The Proctor(s) will remind competitors to turn off Wi-Fi and all other internet access on all of their electronic devices and to put away headphones, earbuds, and similar devices.
- The Proctor(s) is to be aware that many devices automatically search for and activate any available internet connections without the competitors’ knowledge.
- The Proctor(s) will minimize communication with competitors in the Extemp Prep Room.
Delivery
The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props
Presentation Rule #5: No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message. Stoa encourages authentic gestures and facial expressions in speech delivery. However, when a feature that is on or part of the student’s body or clothing, or in the competition room, is used to visually enhance the speech as support or evidence, it becomes a prop and is not permitted.
3Ballot
Extemporaneous
A speech that critically evaluates a current event with credible evidence to support the speaker’s position on the topic
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Extemporaneous – Content Outweighs Delivery | ||
| Analysis: Explains the topic with background and context. Critically evaluates the issue with diverse sources. Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the topic. Takes a position and supports it with facts and reason. | 1 5 | |
| Rhetoric: Builds credibility through multiple cited sources (ethos). Supports position with logical analysis (logos). Evokes appropriate response (pathos). | 1 5 | |
| Impact: Communicates why this topic and the answer matter | 1 5 | |
| Structure | ||
| Organization: Introduction relates to topic. Clear thesis statement that answers the question. Organized content; smooth transitions. Effective conclusion. | 1 5 | |
| Language: Vocabulary; rhetorical devices/memorable language | 1 5 | |
| Delivery | ||
| Vocal: Varies volume, rate, and inflection; smooth and polished | 1 5 | |
| Physical: Authentic gestures and movement | 1 5 | |
| Facial: Eye contact; appropriate facial expressions | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised; professional Manner: Confident; sincere |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
This event has no script submission requirement. The rules below still apply.
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
Common Knowledge
While many students have acquired knowledge through their studies and hobbies, not all of it is common to the average person. Thus, detailed knowledge must be cited. This includes dates, statistics, technical information, and facts that the listener would only know if they had researched the topic. When in doubt, cite the source. For more information, see the article from MIT titled “What Is Common Knowledge?”.
Blanket Citations
A blanket citation is when a student claims that a specific source will be the source he/she is using throughout their speech. Many students want to give a blanket citation to eliminate citing the same source multiple times orally. The difficulty for both the Script Reviewer and the Judge is distinguishing the original analysis from sourced materials. This blurs the lines between plagiarism and originality. Blanket citations are not acceptable. Writing a speech that flows smoothly with multiple oral citations may be difficult, but it is a mark of skilled writing and develops ethos with the judge.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
Circumventing the prompt to make the subject matter easier for the student is an unfair competitive advantage, as the student is speaking on a topic they are more comfortable with, rather than the chosen topic. Pre-written speeches may not be used for this event as they compromise the purpose of intelligent and inventive speech and thought, proceeding from the prompt during preparation time. Students using a prepared speech have taken more than their allotted prep time to craft a compelling speech, which gives them a competitive advantage over students creating a speech in the moment.
- The competitor must state the selected question early in the speech and answer the selected question. They will take a position on that question and support that position with analysis and outside evidence.
- Nothing may be used during the competitor’s speech other than one 3” x 5” card and the topic paper.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during preparation and/or delivery of the speech, other than specifically allowed preparation materials.
- When quoting information or data from an outside source, the source must be verbally cited during the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- No audio or visual aids or props may be used during the speech presentation.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- Competitors must not listen to other Extemporaneous competitors speaking before them in the round.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- Maximum speaking time is seven (7) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by fifteen (15) seconds or more.
Preparation and Walk Time – Thirty (30) Minutes. Speaking Time – Seven (7) Minutes.
Mars Hill
Last updated August 30, 2026
The competitor is given four (4) minutes to craft a speech that draws from books, movies, music, and other cultural genres and uses the topic to identify an issue of cultural significance with a focus on using it as a vehicle to lead the listener to biblical truth.
Mars Hill is a speech event that trains students to connect culture and Christianity. The name of this event is taken from the Apostle Paul’s Mars Hill speech in Acts 17. Before the speech, Paul engages with the Epicureans and the Stoic philosophers of the day. It is this group of people who lead him into the Areopagus, where he launches into his famous sermon. From one worldview to the next, Paul responds to the voices of his culture, never failing to speak truth to them. On Mars Hill, Paul explains and uses Greek cultural ideas to find common ground, build a connection, and point to Christ. The objective is for students to recognize that God’s truth is not divorced from culture; rather, it undergirds all of culture because God is the maker and sustainer of all things. In addition, the intention is that students will begin to see shared cultural experiences as a way to draw unbelievers into a conversation that points to Christ in a natural and compassionate way.
The competitor learns to relate cultural references to issues common in humanity to find common ground and draw the listener to Christian truths. The competitor will share biblical principles on a conversational level to inspire reflection, understanding that God’s truth is not divorced from culture. Content outweighs delivery: greater weight should be given to the speech content rather than the presentation style. The content and delivery of the speech should foster a positive rapport with those who may not share the same faith, and the competitor should explain biblical concepts so that they can be understood by someone without biblical knowledge, leaving the listener wanting to hear more.
The views expressed in the MH topics do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of Stoa, the Board, or the Speech Committee. Mars Hill is intended for competitors 14 and older due to some mature themes and elements included in the content.
Preparation Time – Four (4) minutes. Speaking Time – Six (6) Minutes.
1Preparation Rules
Why these rules existAdhering to the Prompt: Circumventing the prompt to make the subject matter easier for the student is an unfair advantage, as the student is speaking on a topic they are more comfortable with, rather than the chosen topic.
Spontaneous Speech: Pre-written speeches may not be used for this event, as they compromise the purpose of intelligent, inventive speech and thought that proceed from the prompt during preparation time. Students who use a prepared speech have taken more than their allotted prep time to craft a compelling speech, which gives them an unfair advantage over students who are creating a speech in the moment.
- All topics must come from the Mars Hill Topics list published on the Stoa website for the current competition year.
- Topics for each individual round must be entirely from one category published on the Stoa website.
- Competitors prepare for Mars Hill through research, analysis, and organization.
- Each competitor may create a resource binder with synopses of topics, statistical notes, quotes, Scripture passages, etc. Speeches must be composed within the room during prep time. Pre-written cards and speeches are not permitted.
- Competitors may not share binders during competition. Each competitor must have their own binder.
2026-2027 Mars Hill TopicsSix categories · tap to expand▾
* Indicates new topic · DA Discretion Advised
Current Film and Television (last 5 years)
- *Superman (PG-13) 2025
- *KPop Demon Hunters (PG) 2025
- *Fantastic Four: First Steps (PG-13) 2025
- *A Man on the Inside, S1, Ep. 1, “Tinker Tailor Older Spy” (TV-14) 2024
- *Project Hail Mary (PG-13) 2026
- Puss in Boots: The Last Wish (PG) 2022
- The Boys in the Boat (PG-13) 2023
- Wicked (PG) 2024 DA
- Andor S1, Ep. 10, “One Way Out” (TV-14) 2022
- Black Panther: Wakanda Forever (PG-13) 2022
- Elemental (PG) 2023
- Top Gun: Maverick (PG-13) 2022
Classic Media
Film and Television
- *The Truman Show (PG) 1998
- *The Man Who Knew Too Much (PG) 1956
- *The Twilight Zone, S2, Ep. 29, “The Obsolete Man” (PG) 1961
- Over the Garden Wall (TV-PG) 2014
- I Love Lucy, S2, Ep. 1, “Job Switching” (TV-PG) 1952
- Song of the Sea (PG) 2014
Music
- *“Gotta Serve Somebody” (Bob Dylan)
- *“Where the Streets Have No Name” (U2)
- “American Pie” (Don McLean)
- “Greatest Love of All” (Whitney Houston)
- “Only the Good Die Young” (Billy Joel)
- “Fire and Rain” (James Taylor)
Current Music
- *“In the Stars” (Benson Boone)
- *“Bloodline” (Alex Warren with Jelly Roll)
- *“Fairytale” (Livingston)
- “You’re on Your Own, Kid” (Taylor Swift)
- “Cleopatra” (The Lumineers)
- “Pictures of Mountains” (Cody Fry)
- “We Didn’t Start the Fire” (Fall Out Boy)
- “Orange Juice” (Noah Kahan)
- “Jesus in LA” (Alec Benjamin)
- “What Was I Made For?” (Billie Eilish)
- “The Search” (NF)
- “Lydia Wears a Cross” (Julia Jacklin)
Literature
Prose
- *The Death of Ivan Ilyich by Leo Tolstoy
- *The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (Book 1) by Douglas Adams
- *“A Hunger Artist” by Franz Kafka
- Killer Angel: A Short Biography of Planned Parenthood’s Founder, Margaret Sanger (Revised Edition) by George Grant
- All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque
- Cry, the Beloved Country by Alan Paton
- Revolution Is Not a Dinner Party by Ying Chang Compestine
- Lord of the Flies by William Golding
- Dracula by Bram Stoker
- The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde
Poetry
- “A Poison Tree” by William Blake
- “The Waste Land” by T.S. Eliot
The Arts
Plays and Musicals
- *Macbeth by William Shakespeare
- *Fiddler on the Roof by Bock, Harnick, and Stein
- An Enemy of the People by Henrik Ibsen
- Fences by August Wilson
Visual Art
- *Self-Portrait with Bandaged Ear by Vincent van Gogh
- *Burning Man effigies
- Empty by Rone
- School of Athens by Raphael
- Cut Paper by Sachiko Abe
- The Parthenon of Books by Marta Minujín
- Fallen Angel by Alexandre Cabanel
- right? by Banu Cennetoğlu
Cultural Voices
Talks
- *“An Honest Conversation on AI and Humanity @ WEF” with Yuval Noah Harari
- *“Carl R. Trueman on The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self”
- *“Can This Man Live Forever? - The Big Interview” by Wired
- “The Rise of the “Trauma Essay” in College Applications” by Tina Yong, TED Talk
Podcasts
- The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling, Chapter 7, “What If You’re Wrong?” by The Free Press DA
- Honestly with Bari Weiss “The Iranian Regime’s Most Wanted Woman”
Short Films
- “Author Mel Robbins Explains the ’Let Them’ Approach to Living” (2025)
- “Jim Jones: The Man Who Caused A Mass Death” (2025) DA
- “He Gets Us” ad campaign
- “Dove Real Beauty Sketches” (2013)
- If Anything Happens I Love You (PG) 2020
Spoken Word
- “Every 40 Seconds” by Patrick Roche
Research
As they conduct their research, competitors should remember that this event aims to share the hope of the Gospel with a world that is often hostile to God. Their presentation should demonstrate both a thorough understanding of the prompt and a researched biblical response by:
- Describing the chosen piece and its context or purpose
- Identifying a culturally relevant issue related to the piece and explaining its significance
- Showing how the God of the Bible offers a better solution to humanity’s problems than any human answer
- Concluding with a connection directing the listeners to biblical truth found in Christ
2Presentation Rules
Just as Paul demonstrates in Acts 17, Mars Hill speeches should be delivered in a gracious, respectful, and conversational manner while going deeply into the truth of the Bible and the greatness of God. Paul understood that his audience did not hold a biblical worldview, so likewise, the competitor should explain any biblical stories, illustrations, or terminology for those without prior knowledge of the Bible. Finally, the speech should be presented in a way that leaves someone who does not embrace the true claims of Christianity open to hearing more.
- The competitor must summarize the selected topic and its context and provide a researched biblical response.
- The competitor may only use a single note card, 4” x 6” or smaller (prepared during prep time), and the selected topic paper.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during preparation time and/or delivery of the speech, other than specifically allowed preparation materials.
- No audio, visual aids, or props may be used.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- If quoting information from an outside source, the source must be verbally cited during the speech. Use of another source’s words or ideas without crediting is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden. See the Stoa Plagiarism Policy.
- Competitors must not listen to other Mars Hill competitors speaking before them in the round.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor with the timepiece counting up.
- Maximum speaking time is six (6) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going over time by fifteen (15) seconds or more.
Preparation Time – Four (4) minutes. Speaking Time – Six (6) Minutes.
- The Head Judge in each room will be given the topics to distribute to each competitor along with instructions regarding room administration.
- A list of possible topics will be given to each of the judges in the competition room.
- All topics in the same round must be of the same category (e.g., “The Arts,” “Literature,” etc.).
- In the room, a competitor will draw three (3) single topics, select one (1), and return the other two (2) topics before leaving the room. The selected topic should not be returned.
- Preparation time begins as soon as the competitor draws the first topic. The competitor will have four (4) minutes to prepare an original six (6) minute speech.
- During preparation time, the competitor may only use his/her binder to prepare a single note card for presentation. No electronic media is allowed.
- During preparation time, the timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting down.
- Unused preparation time may not be added to the speaking time.
Delivery
The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props
Presentation Rule #4: No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message. Stoa encourages authentic gestures and facial expressions in speech delivery. However, when a feature that is on or part of the student’s body or clothing, or in the competition room, is used to visually enhance the speech as support or evidence, it becomes a prop and is not permitted.
3Ballot
Mars Hill
A limited prep speech that uses cultural references to draw listeners to biblical truth
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Mars Hill – Content Outweighs Delivery | ||
| Analysis: Demonstrates knowledge of topic through summary and context. Identifies and explains an issue and/or philosophy revealed by the topic. Utilizes both the topic and the issue to lead the listener to Biblical truth. | 1 5 | |
| Rhetoric: Credible and sincere connection with audience. Compelling and persuasive reasoning. Explains Biblical content for those unfamiliar with it. | 1 5 | |
| Impact: Communicates why the issue and/or philosophy appeals to the culture. Compassionately addresses differences and explains how the Bible has a better answer. | 1 5 | |
| Structure | ||
| Organization: Relevant and engaging introduction. Cohesive body of thought. Conclusion promotes reflection. | 1 5 | |
| Language: Vocabulary; rhetorical devices/memorable language | 1 5 | |
| Delivery | ||
| Vocal: Varies volume, rate, and inflection; conversational | 1 5 | |
| Physical: Authentic gestures and movement | 1 5 | |
| Facial: Eye contact; appropriate facial expressions | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised; professional Manner: Compassionate; sincere; respectful |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
This event has no script submission requirement. The rules below still apply.
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Speeches may not be written by AI, in part or in full. All Mars Hill speeches must be “an original work written by the competitor.” The speech must be written in the student’s authentic and unique voice.
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
Common Knowledge
While many students have acquired knowledge through their studies and hobbies, not all of it is common to the average person. Thus, detailed knowledge must be cited. This includes dates, statistics, technical information, and facts that the listener would only know if they had researched the topic. When in doubt, cite the source. For more information, see the article from MIT titled “What Is Common Knowledge?”.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
Just as Paul demonstrates in Acts 17, Mars Hill speeches should be delivered in a gracious, respectful, and conversational manner while going deeply into the truth of the Bible and the greatness of God. Paul understood that his audience did not hold a biblical worldview, so likewise, the competitor should explain any biblical stories, illustrations, or terminology for those without prior knowledge of the Bible. Finally, the speech should be presented in a way that leaves someone who does not embrace the true claims of Christianity open to hearing more.
- The competitor must summarize the selected topic and its context and provide a researched biblical response.
- The competitor may only use a single note card, 4” x 6” or smaller (prepared during prep time), and the selected topic paper.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during preparation time and/or delivery of the speech, other than specifically allowed preparation materials.
- No audio, visual aids, or props may be used.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- If quoting information from an outside source, the source must be verbally cited during the speech. Use of another source’s words or ideas without crediting is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden. See the Stoa Plagiarism Policy.
- Competitors must not listen to other Mars Hill competitors speaking before them in the round.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor with the timepiece counting up.
- Maximum speaking time is six (6) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going over time by fifteen (15) seconds or more.
Preparation Time – Four (4) minutes. Speaking Time – Six (6) Minutes.
- The Head Judge in each room will be given the topics to distribute to each competitor along with instructions regarding room administration.
- A list of possible topics will be given to each of the judges in the competition room.
- All topics in the same round must be of the same category (e.g., “The Arts,” “Literature,” etc.).
- In the room, a competitor will draw three (3) single topics, select one (1), and return the other two (2) topics before leaving the room. The selected topic should not be returned.
- Preparation time begins as soon as the competitor draws the first topic. The competitor will have four (4) minutes to prepare an original six (6) minute speech.
- During preparation time, the competitor may only use his/her binder to prepare a single note card for presentation. No electronic media is allowed.
- During preparation time, the timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting down.
- Unused preparation time may not be added to the speaking time.
Original Oratory
Last updated August 30, 2026
Original Oratory is a prepared speech written by the competitor on a topic of the competitor’s choice.
To develop a winsome, polished speaker who can present an engaging, well-organized, informative speech that explains, describes, or exposes a topic.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
As a Christian community, Stoa’s mission is “to equip homeschool students, through competitive speech and debate, to think critically, engage graciously, and speak boldly from a Biblical worldview.” In line with this mission, Stoa requires competitors to craft their speeches through the lens of Philippians 4:8, centering on that which is “good, right, honorable, and just.” We do not shy away from difficult topics, but we believe that when these are presented, they should include redemptive value, with the goal of maintaining a God-honoring atmosphere.
Competitors must avoid content that disturbs or is sensationalized primarily for shock value. If a speech contains material that is not family-friendly, the competitor must provide a concise content warning and dismiss children in the room before beginning the speech.
1Preparation Rules
- The competitor may prepare a speech on any topic.
- The speech may inform, entertain, inspire, or eulogize.
- The speech must be an original work written by the competitor.
- The Original Oratory speech may be used in multiple leagues during any given competitive season. However, if the competitor uses a speech topic in any competition in any league, that competitor may not reuse it in subsequent years of competition.
- The speech may be entered in only one event per tournament. The competitor may place the speech in a different event within the same competitive season.
- The competitor may enter only one speech per event.
- The competitor must provide a script and a citation page at each tournament, along with the completed Platform Speech Script Submission Form. All sources must be cited parenthetically, identified orally within the speech, and documented on the citation page. Note: Electronic Script Submission is required at NITOC.
- A maximum of 30% of the speech may consist of directly quoted material.
2Presentation Rules
- Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another source’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for use of a written script or notes in competition.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during delivery of the speech.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Audience members and/or judges may not be aids or active participants in the speech.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is ten (10) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
Delivery
The student must perform the speech as written and approved by the Script Submission Team. Students are not permitted to ad-lib within their speech or provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff. This would allow them to use unapproved verbiage, which may create a competitive advantage. The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props and Participation
Presentation Rule #4: No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message. Stoa encourages authentic gestures and facial expressions in speech delivery. However, when a feature that is on or part of the student’s body or clothing is used to visually enhance the speech as support or evidence, it becomes a prop and is not permitted.
Presentation Rule 6: Audience members and/or judges may not be aids or active participants in the speech.
Engaging the judges mentally, intellectually, or emotionally is encouraged. Asking the judge or audience to “consider” or “imagine” is natural in platform speaking and is permitted. However, asking the judge or audience to do or perform a physical action (e.g., “Look at…,” “Close your eyes…”) calls for judges to actively participate in the speech and is not permitted.
3Ballot
Original Oratory
A well-written speech that engages the audience and expands their understanding of the topic
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Content | ||
| Structure: Engaging and relevant introduction. Clear thesis statement. Organized content; smooth transitions. Effective conclusion. | 1 5 | |
| Rhetoric: Builds credibility through sources and/or personal connection (ethos). Explains concepts using reason (logos). Evokes appropriate emotional responses (pathos). Utilizes creative examples and illustrations. | 1 5 | |
| Language: Vocabulary; rhetorical devices/memorable language | 1 5 | |
| Impact: Compelling message; addresses topic in a unique way; achieves purpose | 1 5 | |
| Delivery | ||
| Vocal: Varies volume, rate, and inflection; smooth and polished | 1 5 | |
| Physical: Authentic gestures and movement | 1 5 | |
| Facial: Eye contact; appropriate facial expressions | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised; professional Manner: Confident; sincere; winsome |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Speeches may not be written by AI, in part or in full. All Original Oratory speeches must be “an original work written by the competitor.” The speech must be written in the student’s authentic and unique voice.
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
Common Knowledge
While many students have gathered knowledge throughout their studies and hobbies, not all of that knowledge is common to the average person. Thus, detailed knowledge must be cited. This includes dates, statistics, technical information, and facts that the listener would only know if they had researched the topic. When in doubt, cite the source. For more information, see the article from MIT titled “What Is Common Knowledge?”.
Blanket Citations
A blanket citation is when a student claims that a specific source will be the source he/she is using throughout their speech. Many students want to give a blanket citation to eliminate citing the same source multiple times orally. The difficulty for both the Reviewer and the Judge is distinguishing the original analysis from sourced materials. This blurs the lines between plagiarism and originality. Blanket citations are not acceptable. Writing a script that flows smoothly with multiple oral citations may be difficult, but it is a mark of skilled writing and develops ethos with the judge.
AI and Platform Speeches
Preparation Rule #3: The speech must be an original work written by the competitor.
All Platform events must be an original work written by the competitor. AI may not generate a competitor’s original work. Be aware that any quotes garnered from AI must be cited from the original source (not from AI). AI is not considered a reliable source for accurate quotes and statistics.
Citations
Why Cite Your Sources: Citing your sources is important for several reasons.
- It gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your speech.
- It gives credibility (ethos) to you as a speechwriter who did your due diligence in researching your speech. It also allows you to “borrow” the credibility of the sources you use.
- It allows those who hear your speech to identify your sources in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your speech.
- Citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your speech writing. Use citations when you directly quote, paraphrase, or summarize information from any source.
Platform Rules
- Preparation Rule #7: The competitor must provide a script and a citation page at each tournament, along with the completed Platform Speech Script Submission Form. All sources must be cited parenthetically, identified orally within the speech, and documented on the citation page. Note: Electronic Script Submission is required at NITOC.
- Presentation Rule #1: Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
How to Cite in Your Script: Stoa does not mandate a specific citation style (MLA, Chicago, APA). However, it is imperative that your source(s) be cited. If you directly quote, paraphrase, or summarize information from any source, you must both:
1. Identify your source orally for your audience. The following are excellent examples of different yet acceptable and appropriate ways to do this.
- a. Author — Example: A research study by Alexander Bartik and colleagues found that “…”
- b. Title of Work — Example: In a report titled “Education During COVID-19 and Beyond”, the UN predicts …
- c. Title of Source of Work — Example: Several studies, including this one done by the National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice, found that “…”
- d. Bible Sources (Quoted) — When using the Bible as a source in a platform, be sure to name the chapter(s) and verse(s) if applicable. Example: According to John 3:16, “....”
2. Cite your source in the text of the speech (parenthetically) to easily connect it to the source entry on your Citation Page.
- a. If possible, include the author’s name and the page number. Example: A research study by Alexander Bartik and colleagues found that “…” (Bartik, et al, 37). Example: The Washington Post quoted a study showing … (Wan). Example: Several studies, including this one done by the National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice, found that “…” (Camera).
- b. If no author is given, use the title of the work. Example: A study by FAIR Health investigated … (FAIR Health, 2).
- c. Scriptural sources must include the name of the version followed by the book, chapter, and verse (if applicable). Example: According to John 3:16, “....” (King James Bible, John 3:16).
3. How to Cite in Your Citation Page: You must provide a list of all the sources you have used in your speech, preferably alphabetized. You may use any citation style (APA, MLA, etc.) for this list. [See Purdue Online Writing Lab (owl.english.purdue.edu) for detailed explanations of how to create this list based on the style you choose.] The parenthetical citation in your script should correspond with the first word of the matching entry on the Citation Page. Example: Script: A research study by Alexander Bartik and colleagues found that “…” (Bartik et al, 37) Citation Page: Bartik, Alexander et al. “The Impact of COVID-19 on Small Business Outcomes and Expectations.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 30, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006991117.
What NOT to Do:
- Leave citations out. This violates Stoa’s Plagiarism policy and may result in disqualification or penalties.
- Lump all your sources together. This does not allow your audience to know from whom you got specific information.
- Avoid asking for help. If you are unsure if you are citing your sources correctly, ask a parent, coach, or a member of the Speech Committee.
- Use AI to compose or generate your Platform. All Platform events must be “an original work written by the competitor” in their own authentic and unique voice. Remember: any ideas or quotes garnered from AI must be cited from the original source.
Script Submission
Purpose: Platform speech scripts should contain the exact text of the student’s original speech for the purposes of accountability. Though the speech must be original, it may consist of support from outside sources. The sources of any contributing information must be formally cited so that credit is given where credit is due. The script preparation instructions below will assist with that process.
- The speech must be an original work, written by the student.
- The student must submit a typewritten copy of the speech.
- All sources must be cited in the text of the speech, identified verbally within the speech, and documented on the citation page.
- All direct quotations must be underlined.
- No more than 30% of the speech may consist of direct quotations.
- A Citation Page must be created on a separate page at the end of the speech. Any format is acceptable. (May use www.easybib.com or other applications to assist with the Citation Page.)
- All sources must be included on the Citation Page.
- A current Script Submission Form must be submitted with the speech script at each tournament.
Platform Preparation Video
For succinct instructions on creating the Script Copy and Original Source Copy of the scripts, see the Rapid Review and Approve Video.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
- Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another source’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for use of a written script or notes in competition.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during delivery of the speech.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Audience members and/or judges may not be aids or active participants in the speech.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is ten (10) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
Persuasive
Last updated August 30, 2026
The Persuasive speech is a prepared speech written by the competitor that advocates a specific position or course of action.
To develop a winsome, polished speaker who can state a clearly worded position supported by convincing arguments and well-researched support in order to influence the audience’s opinion.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
As a Christian community, Stoa’s mission is “to equip homeschool students, through competitive speech and debate, to think critically, engage graciously, and speak boldly from a Biblical worldview.” In line with this mission, Stoa requires competitors to craft their speeches through the lens of Philippians 4:8, centering on that which is “good, right, honorable, and just.” We do not shy away from difficult topics, but we believe that when these are presented, they should include redemptive value, with the goal of maintaining a God-honoring atmosphere.
Competitors must avoid content that disturbs or is sensationalized primarily for shock value. If a speech contains material that is not family-friendly, the competitor must provide a concise content warning and dismiss children in the room before beginning the speech.
1Preparation Rules
- The competitor may prepare a speech on any topic.
- The speech should advocate a particular position or course of action with the goal of influencing the audience’s opinion.
- The speech must be an original work written by the competitor.
- The Persuasive speech may be used in multiple leagues during any given competitive season. However, if the competitor uses a speech topic in any competition in any league, that competitor may not reuse it in subsequent years of competition.
- The speech may be entered in only one event per tournament. The competitor may place the speech in a different event within the same competitive season.
- The competitor may enter only one speech per event.
- The competitor must provide a script and a citation page at each tournament, along with the completed Platform Speech Script Submission Form. All sources must be cited parenthetically, identified orally within the speech, and documented on the citation page.
- A maximum of 30% of the speech may consist of directly quoted material.
2Presentation Rules
- Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another source’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for use of a written script or notes in competition.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during delivery of the speech.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Audience members and/or judges may not be aids or active participants in the speech.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is ten (10) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
Delivery
The student must perform the speech as written and approved by the Script Submission Team. Students are not permitted to ad-lib within their speech or provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff. This would allow them to use unapproved verbiage, which may create a competitive advantage. The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props and Participation
Presentation Rule #4: No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message. Stoa encourages authentic gestures and facial expressions in speech delivery. However, when a feature that is on or part of the student’s body or clothing is used to visually enhance the speech as support or evidence, it becomes a prop and is not permitted.
Presentation Rule 6: Audience members and/or judges may not be aids or active participants in the speech.
Engaging the judges mentally, intellectually, or emotionally is encouraged. Asking the judge or audience to “consider” or “imagine” is natural in platform speaking and is permitted. However, asking the judge or audience to do or perform a physical action (e.g., “Look at…,” “Close your eyes…”) calls for judges to actively participate in the speech and is not permitted.
3Ballot
Persuasive
A well-written speech that attempts to persuade the audience by advocating a specific position or course of action
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Content | ||
| Structure: Engaging and relevant introduction. Clear thesis statement. Organized content; smooth transitions. Effective conclusion. | 1 5 | |
| Rhetoric: Builds credibility through sources and/or personal connection (ethos). Explains concepts using reason (logos). Evokes appropriate emotional responses (pathos). Utilizes creative examples and illustrations. | 1 5 | |
| Language: Vocabulary; rhetorical devices/memorable language | 1 5 | |
| Persuasion | ||
| Message: Explains a problem; advocates a specific position, solution, or call to action | 1 5 | |
| Impact: Compelling; thought-provoking | 1 5 | |
| Delivery | ||
| Vocal: Varies volume, rate, and inflection; smooth and polished | 1 5 | |
| Physical: Authentic gestures and movement | 1 5 | |
| Facial: Eye contact; appropriate facial expressions | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised; professional Manner: Confident; sincere; winsome |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Speeches may not be written by AI, in part or in full. All Persuasive speeches must be “an original work written by the competitor.” The speech must be written in the student’s authentic and unique voice.
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
Common Knowledge
While many students have acquired knowledge through their studies and hobbies, not all of it is common to the average person. Thus, detailed knowledge must be cited. This includes dates, statistics, technical information, and facts that the listener would only know if they had researched the topic. When in doubt, cite the source. For more information, see the article from MIT titled “What Is Common Knowledge?”.
Blanket Citations
A blanket citation is when a student claims that a specific source will be the source he/she is using throughout their speech. Many students want to give a blanket citation to eliminate citing the same source multiple times orally. The difficulty for both the Reviewer and the Judge is distinguishing the original analysis from sourced materials. This blurs the lines between plagiarism and originality. Blanket citations are not acceptable. Writing a script that flows smoothly while incorporating multiple oral citations can be difficult, but it is a mark of skilled writing and helps develop ethos with the judge.
AI and Platform Speeches
Preparation Rule #3: The speech must be an original work written by the competitor.
All Platform events must be an original work written by the competitor. AI may not generate a competitor’s original work. Be aware that any quotes garnered from AI must be cited from the original source (not from AI). AI is not considered a reliable source for accurate quotes and statistics.
Citations
Why Cite Your Sources: Citing your sources is important for several reasons.
- It gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your speech.
- It gives credibility (ethos) to you as a speechwriter who did your due diligence in researching your speech. It also allows you to “borrow” the credibility of the sources you use.
- It allows those who hear your speech to identify your sources in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your speech.
- Citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your speech writing. Use citations when you directly quote, paraphrase, or summarize information from any source.
Platform Rules
- Preparation Rule #7: The competitor must provide a script and a citation page at each tournament, along with the completed Platform Speech Script Submission Form. All sources must be cited parenthetically, identified orally within the speech, and documented on the citation page. Note: Electronic Script Submission is required at NITOC.
- Presentation Rule #1: Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
How to Cite in Your Script: Stoa does not mandate a specific citation style (MLA, Chicago, APA). However, it is imperative that your source(s) be cited. If you directly quote, paraphrase, or summarize information from any source, you must both:
1. Identify your source orally for your audience. The following are excellent examples of different yet acceptable and appropriate ways to do this.
- a. Author — Example: A research study by Alexander Bartik and colleagues found that “…”
- b. Title of Work — Example: In a report titled “Education During COVID-19 and Beyond”, the UN predicts …
- c. Title of Source of Work — Example: Several studies, including this one done by the National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice, found that “…”
- d. Bible Sources (Quoted) — When using the Bible as a source in a platform, name the chapter(s) and verse(s) if applicable. Example: According to John 3:16, “....”
2. Cite your source in the text of the speech (parenthetically) to easily connect it to the source entry on your Citation Page.
- a. If possible, include the author’s name and the page number. Example: A research study by Alexander Bartik and colleagues found that “…” (Bartik, et al, 37). Example: The Washington Post quoted a study showing … (Wan). Example: Several studies, including this one done by the National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice, found that “…” (Camera).
- b. If no author is given, use the title of the work. Example: A study by FAIR Health investigated … (FAIR Health, 2).
- c. Scriptural sources must include the name of the version followed by the book, chapter, and verse (if applicable). Example: According to John 3:16, “....” (King James Bible, John 3:16).
3. How to Cite in Your Citation Page: You must provide a list of all the sources you have used in your speech, preferably alphabetized. You may use any citation style (APA, MLA, etc.) for this list. [See Purdue Online Writing Lab (owl.english.purdue.edu) for detailed explanations of how to create this list based on the style you choose.] The parenthetical citation in your script should correspond with the first word of the matching entry on the Citation Page. Example: Script: A research study by Alexander Bartik and colleagues found that “…” (Bartik et al, 37) Citation Page: Bartik, Alexander et al. “The Impact of COVID-19 on Small Business Outcomes and Expectations.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 30, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006991117.
What NOT to Do:
- Leave citations out. This violates Stoa’s Plagiarism policy and may result in disqualification or penalties.
- Lump all your sources together. This does not allow your audience to know from whom you got specific information.
- Avoid asking for help. If you are unsure if you are citing your sources correctly, ask a parent, coach, or a member of the Speech Committee.
- Use AI to compose or generate your Platform. All Platform events must be “an original work written by the competitor” in their own authentic and unique voice. Remember: any ideas or quotes garnered from AI must be cited from the original source.
Script Submission
Purpose: Platform speech scripts should contain the exact text of the student’s original speech for the purposes of accountability. Though the speech must be original, it may consist of support from outside sources. The sources of any contributing information must be formally cited so that credit is given where credit is due. The script preparation instructions below will assist with that process.
- The speech must be an original work, written by the student.
- The student must submit a typewritten copy of the speech.
- All sources must be cited in the text of the speech, identified verbally within the speech, and documented on the citation page.
- All direct quotations must be underlined.
- No more than 30% of the speech may consist of direct quotations.
- A Citation Page must be created on a separate page at the end of the speech. Any format is acceptable. (May use www.easybib.com or other applications to assist with the Citation Page.)
- All sources must be included on the Citation Page.
- A current Script Submission Form must be submitted with the speech script at each tournament.
Platform Preparation Video
For succinct instructions on creating the Script Copy and Original Source Copy of the scripts, see the Rapid Review and Approve Video.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
- Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another source’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for use of a written script or notes in competition.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during delivery of the speech.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Audience members and/or judges may not be aids or active participants in the speech.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is ten (10) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
Expository
Last updated August 30, 2026
The Expository speech is a prepared speech written by the competitor that explains, illustrates, or demonstrates a topic, concept, process, or skill through both words and visuals (e.g., illustrated boards, physical props, digital and electronic presentations, or any combination).
To develop a winsome, polished speaker who can constructively use chosen media to enhance a topic or demonstrate a process or skill.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
As a Christian community, Stoa’s mission is “to equip homeschool students, through competitive speech and debate, to think critically, engage graciously, and speak boldly from a Biblical worldview.” In line with this mission, Stoa requires competitors to craft their speeches through the lens of Philippians 4:8, centering on that which is “good, right, honorable, and just.” We do not shy away from difficult topics, but we believe that when these are presented, they should include redemptive value, with the goal of maintaining a God-honoring atmosphere.
Competitors must avoid content that disturbs or is sensationalized primarily for shock value. If a speech contains material that is not family-friendly, the competitor must provide a concise content warning and dismiss children in the room before beginning the speech.
1Preparation Rules
- The competitor may prepare a speech on any topic.
- The speech may inform, persuade, entertain, inspire, instruct, or eulogize.
- The speech must be an original work written by the competitor.
- The Expository speech may be used in multiple leagues during any given competitive season. However, if the competitor uses a speech topic in any competition in any league, that competitor may not reuse it in subsequent years of competition.
- The speech may be entered in only one event per tournament. The competitor may place the speech in a different event within the same competitive season.
- The competitor may enter only one speech per event.
- The competitor must provide a script and a citation page at each tournament along with the completed Platform Speech Script Submission Form. All sources must be cited parenthetically, identified orally within the speech, and documented on the citation page.
- Copyrighted images must also be cited on the final citation page but need not be cited orally or parenthetically.
- No more than 30% of the speech may include directly quoted material. This limit applies to all direct quotes, including audio or video clips used in the presentation as well as any pre-recorded words spoken by the competitor.
2Presentation Rules
- Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another source’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for use of a script or notes in competition.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual or physical assistance during setup and/or delivery of the speech.
- Audio/visual aids and effects may be used.
- Computers may be used.
- Tournaments shall provide access to power outlets in presentation rooms; however, all props and equipment needed for the speech must be supplied by the competitor (e.g., projectors, screens, power cords, tables, chairs, etc.).
- Each competitor has approximately two (2) minutes for setup. They must set up and remove props and other aids without assistance. Physical restrictions may be accommodated with approval from the Tournament Director.
- The following are prohibited from use as props: weapons (real, fake, or toy), any bladed instruments, including food preparation knives of any material, explosives, incendiary devices, live animals, and/or facility/tournament furniture.
- Any liquids, art supplies/mediums, and/or chemicals must be secured to avoid facility damage.
- Any special clothing related to the speech may only be put on or displayed after the speech begins.
- The presentation area must be left in the same condition as it was prior to the speech.
- Nothing may be distributed or offered to the judges or audience members.
- Audience members and/or judges may not be aids or active participants in the speech.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is ten (10) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
Delivery
The student must perform the speech as written and approved by the Script Submission Team. Students are not permitted to ad-lib within their speech or provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff. This would allow them to use unapproved verbiage, which may create a competitive advantage. The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
3Ballot
Expository
An engaging, well-written speech that uses creative visual and/or audio aids to expand the understanding of the topic or demonstrate a skill or process
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Content | ||
| Structure: Engaging and relevant introduction. Clear thesis statement. Organized content; smooth transitions. Effective conclusion. | 1 5 | |
| Rhetoric: Builds credibility through sources and/or personal connection (ethos). Explains concepts using reason (logos). Evokes appropriate emotional responses (pathos). Utilizes creative examples and illustrations. | 1 5 | |
| Language: Vocabulary; rhetorical devices/memorable language | 1 5 | |
| Impact: Compelling message; addresses topic in a unique way; achieves purpose | 1 5 | |
| Visual and/or Audio Aids | ||
| Props: Enhance/illustrate content; proficient handling; creative and memorable | 1 5 | |
| Delivery | ||
| Vocal: Varies volume, rate, and inflection; smooth and polished | 1 5 | |
| Physical: Authentic gestures and movement | 1 5 | |
| Facial: Eye contact; appropriate facial expressions | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised; professional Manner: Confident; sincere; winsome |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Speeches may not be written by AI, in part or in full. All Expository speeches must be “an original work written by the competitor.” The speech must be written in the student’s authentic and unique voice.
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
Common Knowledge
While many students have gathered knowledge throughout their studies and hobbies, not all of that knowledge is common to the average person. Thus, detailed knowledge must be cited. This includes dates, statistics, technical information, and facts that the listener would only know if they had researched the topic. When in doubt, cite the source. For more information, see the article from MIT titled “What Is Common Knowledge?”.
Blanket Citations
A blanket citation is when a student claims that a specific source will be the source he/she is using throughout their speech. Many students want to give a blanket citation to eliminate citing the same source multiple times orally. The difficulty for both the Reviewer and the Judge is distinguishing the original analysis from sourced materials. This blurs the lines between plagiarism and originality. Blanket citations are not acceptable. Writing a script that flows smoothly with multiple oral citations may be difficult, but it is a mark of skilled writing and develops ethos with the judge.
AI and Platform Speeches
AI may not be used to write a speech. All Platform events must be “an original work written by the competitor.” Be aware that any quotes garnered from AI must be cited from the original source (not from AI). AI is not considered a reliable source for accurate quotes and statistics.
Audio and Video Clips
Preparation Rule 9 states, “No more than 30% of the speech may include directly quoted material. This limit applies to all direct quotes, including audio or video clips used in the presentation, as well as any pre-recorded words spoken by the competitor.”
The 30% in Rule 9 is measured from the total word count. A student’s total word count needs to include:
- Quotes and statistics from other sources
- Words spoken or sung while showing a clip from a video or soundtrack
- Static words read by the audience while showing a video (Words on boards or PowerPoint presentations are not in the word count.)
- The student’s own words that have been pre-recorded
All quoted words included in the word count should be underlined (including the student’s original pre-recorded words and song lyrics).
We recognize that many students use videos or music with no words in their speech. This is allowed; however, an Expository Speech is primarily a speaking event.
Citations
Why Cite Your Sources: Citing your sources is important for several reasons.
- It gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your speech.
- It gives credibility (ethos) to you as a speechwriter who did your due diligence in researching your speech. It also allows you to “borrow” the credibility of the sources you use.
- It allows those who hear your speech to identify your sources in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your speech.
- Citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your speech writing. Use citations when you directly quote, paraphrase, or summarize information from any source.
Platform Rules
- Preparation Rule #7: The competitor must provide a script and a citation page at each tournament, along with the completed Platform Speech Script Submission Form. All sources must be cited parenthetically, identified orally within the speech, and documented on the citation page. Note: Electronic Script Submission is required at NITOC.
- Presentation Rule #1: Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
How to Cite in Your Script: Stoa does not mandate a specific citation style (MLA, Chicago, APA). However, it is imperative that your source(s) be cited. If you directly quote, paraphrase, or summarize information from any source, you must both:
1. Identify your source orally for your audience. The following are excellent examples of different yet acceptable and appropriate ways to do this.
- a. Author — Example: A research study by Alexander Bartik and colleagues found that “…”
- b. Title of Work — Example: In a report titled “Education During COVID-19 and Beyond”, the UN predicts …
- c. Title of Source of Work — Example: Several studies, including this one done by the National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice, found that “…”
- d. Bible Sources (Quoted) — When using the Bible as a source in a platform, be sure to name the chapter(s) and verse(s) if applicable. Example: According to John 3:16, “....”
2. Cite your source in the text of the speech (parenthetically) to easily connect it to the source entry on your Citation Page.
- a. If possible, include the author’s name and the page number. Example: A research study by Alexander Bartik and colleagues found that “…” (Bartik, et al, 37). Example: The Washington Post quoted a study showing … (Wan). Example: Several studies, including this one done by the National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice, found that “…” (Camera).
- b. If no author is given, use the title of the work. Example: A study by FAIR Health investigated … (FAIR Health, 2).
- c. Scriptural sources must include the name of the version followed by the book, chapter, and verse (if applicable). Example: According to John 3:16, “....” (King James Bible, John 3:16).
3. How to Cite in Your Citation Page: You must provide a list of all the sources you have used in your speech, preferably alphabetized. You may use any citation style (APA, MLA, etc.) for this list. [See Purdue Online Writing Lab (owl.english.purdue.edu) for detailed explanations of how to create this list based on the style you choose.] The parenthetical citation in your script should correspond with the first word of the matching entry on the Citation Page. Example: Script: A research study by Alexander Bartik and colleagues found that “…” (Bartik et al, 37) Citation Page: Bartik, Alexander et al. “The Impact of COVID-19 on Small Business Outcomes and Expectations.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 30, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006991117.
4. How to Cite Images: For speeches with visual aids, any copyrighted images or graphic citations should be included as a second “Image Citations” section on your citation page. They do not need to be cited in-text or orally in the script.
What NOT to Do:
- Leave citations out. This violates Stoa’s Plagiarism policy and may result in disqualification or penalties.
- Lump all your sources together. This does not allow your audience to know from whom you got specific information.
- Avoid asking for help. If you are unsure if you are citing your sources correctly, ask a parent, coach, or a member of the Speech Committee.
- Use AI to write your Platform. All Platform events must be “an original work written by the competitor” in their own authentic and unique voice. Remember: any ideas or quotes garnered from AI must be cited from the original source.
Script Submission
Purpose: Platform speech scripts should contain the exact text of the student’s original speech for the purposes of accountability. Though the speech must be original, it may consist of support from outside sources. The sources of any contributing information must be formally cited so that credit is given where credit is due. The script preparation instructions below will assist with that process.
- The speech must be an original work, written by the student.
- The student must submit a typewritten copy of the speech.
- All sources must be cited in the text of the speech, identified verbally within the speech, and documented on the citation page.
- All direct quotations must be underlined.
- No more than 30% of the speech may consist of direct quotations.
- A Citation Page must be created on a separate page at the end of the speech. Any format is acceptable. (May use www.easybib.com or other applications to assist with the Citation Page.)
- All sources must be included on the Citation Page.
- A current Script Submission Form must be submitted with the speech script at each tournament.
In addition, Expository Speeches must:
- Include copyrighted graphics and images on the Citation Page.
- Include all direct quotes, including audio or video clips used in the presentation, as well as any prerecorded words spoken by the competitor in the count for direct quotations. These words must be included in your script and underlined. They cannot be more than 30% of the speech.
Platform Preparation Video
For succinct instructions on creating the Script Copy and Original Source Copy of the scripts, see the Rapid Review and Approve Video.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
- Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another source’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for use of a script or notes in competition.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual or physical assistance during setup and/or delivery of the speech.
- Audio/visual aids and effects may be used.
- Computers may be used.
- Tournaments shall provide access to power outlets in presentation rooms; however, all props and equipment needed for the speech must be supplied by the competitor (e.g., projectors, screens, power cords, tables, chairs, etc.).
- Each competitor has approximately two (2) minutes for setup. They must set up and remove props and other aids without assistance. Physical restrictions may be accommodated with approval from the Tournament Director.
- The following are prohibited from use as props: weapons (real, fake, or toy), any bladed instruments, including food preparation knives of any material, explosives, incendiary devices, live animals, and/or facility/tournament furniture.
- Any liquids, art supplies/mediums, and/or chemicals must be secured to avoid facility damage.
- Any special clothing related to the speech may only be put on or displayed after the speech begins.
- The presentation area must be left in the same condition as it was prior to the speech.
- Nothing may be distributed or offered to the judges or audience members.
- Audience members and/or judges may not be aids or active participants in the speech.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is ten (10) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
Literary Interpretation
Last updated August 30, 2026
Literary Interpretation is an original rendition by the competitor of a relatable story from a single published book, short story, or full-length play with a focus on plot and character development. The presentation may range from serious to lighthearted.
To select and analyze quality literature, then bring it to life through the creative use of voice, movement, and facial expression. Competitors should portray an unfolding journey of a character or characters.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
As a Christian community, Stoa’s mission is “to equip homeschool students, through competitive speech and debate, to think critically, engage graciously, and speak boldly from a Biblical worldview.” In line with this mission, Stoa requires competitors to craft their speeches through the lens of Philippians 4:8, centering on that which is “good, right, honorable, and just.” We do not shy away from difficult topics, but we believe that when these are presented, they should include redemptive value, with the goal of maintaining a God-honoring atmosphere.
Competitors must avoid content that disturbs or is sensationalized primarily for shock value. If a speech contains material that is not family-friendly, the competitor must provide a concise content warning and dismiss children in the room before beginning the speech.
1Preparation Rules
- Interpretive literature may come from a variety of genres, including plays, prose, or poetry, but the selection must be from a single printed published work and cannot be authored or self-published by the competitor or a previous competitor.
- The following published works are not permitted: works with fewer than 3,000 words, works that are published online only, and works that are only able to be accessed through online publication sites.
- The following unpublished works are not permitted: blogs and media transcripts (e.g., movie scripts and audio or video recordings not published in written form by the owner).
- The competitor must create a completely original interpretation of literature. Competitors may not copy the added words, cutting, and/or blocking of a previous speech and/or video.
- A maximum of 200 words may be added.
- Added words may be used to create introductions, conclusions, and transitions between the author’s words, phrases, and/or ideas. Joining together disconnected words and/or phrases from the source to create new thoughts or ideas is counted as added words.
- The competitor is allowed to quote external sources in the introduction only. The external source(s), including song lyrics, prefaces, etc., must be cited orally and are considered as part of the 200 added words.
- When identifying the source material(s), the following are not considered added words: the title, the author(s), and the words by and and.
- Changes to pronouns, verb tenses, and character names are allowed and not counted as added words.
- Words from the original source may be repeated without being counted as added words.
- Added words may not come from a second source unless they are in the introduction (see 5b). Weaving multiple sources (including literature, song lyrics, prefaces, book covers, etc.) is prohibited.
- Dialogue from one character may be given to another character.
- A competitor may use an interpretive selection in multiple leagues during any given competitive season. The selection may be entered in only one event per tournament (e.g., either Literary or Open but not both).
- Once the competitor uses a selection (book, play, short story, etc.) in any competition in any league, that competitor may not reuse any part of the published work in subsequent years of competition. The Bible is an exception to this rule.
- The competitor may enter only one interpretive selection per event.
- The competitor must provide a script and scanned/photocopied pages used from the original source at each tournament. The title page, copyright page, and original source pages must be from the same source. See the Script Submission Form. Note: Electronic Script Submission is required at NITOC.
2Presentation Rules
- The competitor must identify the title and author near the beginning of the piece. The competitor will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite the source.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during the delivery of the speech.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- This is a speech event, but some singing and dancing are permitted as appropriate to the piece.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for the use of a written script or notes in competition.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is ten (10) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
Delivery
The student must perform the speech as written and approved by the Script Submission Team. Students are not permitted to ad-lib within their speech or provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff. This would allow them to use unapproved verbiage, which may create a competitive advantage. The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props
Presentation Rule #3: No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message.
Interp speeches utilize the voice, facial expressions, and actions. When a student uses items such as their hair, pockets, eyeglasses, etc., these items become incorporated into their speech as props. This is a rule violation.
3Ballot
Literary Interpretation
An interpretation with a focus on plot and character development, portraying an unfolding journey
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Selection | ||
| Literature: Quality, plot-based selection. Appeals to wide-ranging audience. Suitable for speaker. | 1 5 | |
| Interpretation | ||
| Storyline: Well-defined beginning, climax, and resolution. Introduction provides context. Clear development of character(s) and story. Insight and understanding of the selection. | 1 5 | |
| Characterization: Differentiation between characters (vocal variety, facial expressions, physical portrayals). Believable and consistent characters. | 1 5 | |
| Performance: Understandable setting. Effective transitions. Range of moods or emotions. Purposeful physical movement. | 1 5 | |
| Delivery: Well-timed pacing and pausing. Articulation, projection, volume. | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised, professional Presentation: Creative, captivating |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Literary Interpretation Rule #4: The competitor must create a completely original interpretation of literature. Competitors may not copy the added words, cutting, and/or blocking of a previous speech and/or video.
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
Interp Sources
Valid sourcing is an issue of academic integrity. Media transcripts (sources transcribed from a live or recorded performance) are not considered valid sources as they do not appropriately and/or legally give credit to the original author(s). AI is also not regarded as a valid source. It violates Interp Rules as the competitor is not making a “completely original interpretation of literature.” For further consideration, AI is not published or copyrighted and therefore cannot be used for creating Interp scripts.
Stoa desires script approval to be simple and objective. The texts should be in the public domain, accessed universally by any user, and retrievable upon request. The site and literary text must be verifiable and have a publication or copyright date. An upload date alone does not satisfy this requirement.
Unacceptable Sources:
- Blogs (from any source) – A blog is defined as “a regularly updated website or web page, typically one run by an individual or small group, that is written in an informal or conversational style.”
- Media transcripts and performances – These are scripts or script selections which have been transcribed from a live or recorded performance (including theater, movies, television/radio broadcasts, webcasts, internet streaming, YouTube, etc.). Copying content or blocking is not permitted.
- Self-published scripts – These are script selections which are authored or self-published by the competitor or a previous competitor. Self-published scripts are not permitted in LI.
- AI – If AI creates an Interp speech for the competitor, it violates Interp Rules as the competitor is not making a “completely original interpretation of literature.” For further consideration, AI is not published or copyrighted and therefore cannot be used to create Interp scripts.
Acceptable Sources: Sources should have a publication/copyright date. To ensure your piece is approved for NITOC, you should look for a piece that has a permanent number assigned from a nationally or scholastically recognized registry unless the piece was written before 1970. (ISBN numbering system was created in 1973.)
- “LCCN” or “Library of Congress Control Number” – ID found on the pages near the copyright notice.
- “ISBN” or “International Standard Book Number” – ISBN is a number, not a bar code. Number found on the pages near the copyright notice.
- “ISSN” or “International Standard Serial Number” – ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines, and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic. ISSN should be located: preferably, in the upper right corner of the cover; or on the pages near the copyright notice. For a publication in electronic media, the ISSN should be shown on the homepage or on the main menu, if it is an online publication.
- “DOI” or “Digital Object Identifier” – DOI provides a persistent link to its location on the Internet. All DOI numbers begin with a 10 and contain a prefix and a suffix separated by a slash. DOI is typically located on the first page of the electronic journal article, near the copyright notice.
Online Sources
Published Online Sources must have:
- Title Page (if available, screenshots are acceptable)
- Copyright/Publication date
- Author
Your online source will NOT be accepted if any of the following apply:
- It has an upload or posted date rather than a publication or copyright date.
- There is no name or contact information for the publisher.
- It has a Copyright Acknowledgment date rather than a Copyright date.
- It is in an editable format. Sources that use editable formats (i.e., Gutenberg Press) will not be accepted.
- It is a YouTube (or other visual media) transcript.
- It is only available through an online publication site.
- It is published only online (not in print by the publisher).
Remember: POSTED does not equal PUBLISHED and PRINTED.
Archive.org is a great resource for finding verifiable sources for scripts.
Citations
Why Cite Your Sources: Citing your sources is important for several reasons.
- It gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your speech.
- It gives credibility (ethos) to you as a speechwriter who did your due diligence in researching your speech. It also allows you to “borrow” the credibility of the sources you use.
- It allows those who hear your speech to identify your sources in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your speech.
- Citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your speech writing.
Literary Interpretation Rules
- Preparation Rule #5b: The competitor is allowed to quote external sources in the introduction only. The external source(s), including song lyrics, prefaces, etc., must be cited orally and are considered as part of the 200 added words.
- Presentation Rule #1: The competitors must identify the title(s) and author(s) near the beginning of the piece. The competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite all source(s).
How to Cite in Your Script:
1. Identify your source(s) orally for your audience. Example A includes music lyrics.
- b. Example: “This is the story of Piglet Meets a Heffalump by A.A. Milne.”
- c. Example: “Anne of Green Gables, by L.M. Montgomery.”
2. Bible Sources – When using the Bible as a source in an interp, be sure to name the version, book, chapter(s), and verse(s), if applicable.
- a. Example: “From Jonah Chapters 1 through 4 from the King James Bible.”
What NOT to Do:
- Leave citations out. This violates Stoa’s Plagiarism policy and may result in disqualification or penalties.
- Sing in your speech and not attribute credit if the words are not already in the source(s).
- Avoid asking for help. If you are unsure if you are citing your sources correctly, ask a parent, coach, or a Speech Committee member.
- Use AI to create or generate your Interp event. AI is also not regarded as a valid source. It violates Interp Rules as the competitor is not making a “completely original interpretation of literature.” For further consideration, AI is not published or copyrighted and therefore cannot be used for creating Interp scripts.
Script Submission
Limiting added words encourages the use of the original source/literature, increasing the academic rigor of the event. Students who do not abide by the added word limit create an unfair advantage. Having the local and NITOC Script Reviewers confirm the added word count is vital to ensure that checkmarks are awarded fairly.
The student must submit the script in two parts:
- A typewritten script and
- A scanned, photocopied or screenshot of the original source with all added words inserted in the appropriate places.
Typewritten version:
- The typewritten script should be typed exactly as it is going to be presented.
- All added words, not in the original source, must be underlined.
Scanned/Photocopied version:
- Scan/photocopy every original source page which includes words used in the interpretive piece. (The original source is the book, play, anthology, etc. from which the piece is taken.)
- Scan/photocopy the title page of the original source.
- Scan/photocopy the copyright page with the publication date of the original source.
- Highlight all original source words that are used in the script. Do not cross out any words.
- Insert the introduction and any added words in the appropriate spot in the script. (Joining together disconnected words from the source to create new thoughts or ideas are counted as added words.)
- Arrange the pages in the order they will be presented.
- Screenshots – Students who have secured their literary piece from an internet site must create a computer screenshot of the publication date. In addition, one page should include words from their piece to show the internet source of the piece. The screenshot should include any sidebars, headings, etc., that are a part of the computer screen, including the URL of the website. The remaining screenshots only need to contain the portions of the text used. The screenshots will be compiled in exactly the same way the scanned/photocopied pages are to be compiled. Title and publication information is still required.
Note – The goal is to submit two complete copies. One is typed. The other is scanned/photocopied from the original source with all added words inserted, creating a second complete script. The two scripts will read exactly the same.
Note regarding reproductions of copyright materials: The Fair Use Doctrine contained in the Copyright Act gives students permission to use or reproduce portions of a copyrighted work if the work is used as part of a student’s education. Therefore, the Fair Use Doctrine allows for the reproduction of portions of a copyrighted work for script submissions. Please be sure your source complies with the Interp Script Submission Guidelines.
Interp Preparation Video
For succinct instructions on creating the Script Copy and Original Source Copy of the scripts, see the Rapid Review and Approve Video.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
- The competitor must identify the title and author near the beginning of the piece. The competitor will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite the source.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during the delivery of the speech.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- This is a speech event, but some singing and dancing are permitted as appropriate to the piece.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for the use of a written script or notes in competition.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is ten (10) minutes. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
Duo Interpretation
Last updated August 30, 2026
Duo Interpretation is an original rendition by two competitors of a relatable story from one or more published work(s) of literature with a focus on plot and character development that captivates and moves the audience. Stand-up comedy or telling a series of jokes without a corresponding plot is not a Duo Interpretation.
To select and analyze literature, then bring it to life through creative use of voice, movement, and facial expression with a balanced performance between the two competitors but without interacting face to face.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes
As a Christian community, Stoa’s mission is “to equip homeschool students, through competitive speech and debate, to think critically, engage graciously, and speak boldly from a Biblical worldview.” In line with this mission, Stoa requires competitors to craft their speeches through the lens of Philippians 4:8, centering on that which is “good, right, honorable, and just.” We do not shy away from difficult topics, but we believe that when these are presented, they should include redemptive value, with the goal of maintaining a God-honoring atmosphere.
Competitors must avoid content that disturbs or is sensationalized primarily for shock value. If a speech contains material that is not family-friendly, the competitor must provide a concise content warning and dismiss children in the room before beginning the speech.
1Preparation Rules
- Interpretive literature may come from a variety of genres including plays, prose, or poetry, but the selection(s) must be from published work(s) and cannot be authored or self-published by the competitor or a previous competitor. The selection(s) must be in compliance with the rules.
- The following unpublished works are not permitted: blogs and media transcripts (i.e., movie scripts and audio or video recordings that are not published in written form by the owner).
- The competitor must create a completely original interpretation of literature. Competitors may not copy the added words, cutting, and/or blocking of a previous speech and/or video.
- A maximum of 150 words may be added:
- Added words are words uniquely written by the competitor and may be used to create introductions, conclusions, and transitions between the author’s words, phrases, and/or ideas. Finding words within the source to create a new thought, idea, or scene is not allowed.
- When identifying any source material(s), the following are not considered added words: the title(s) the author(s), and the words by and and.
- Changes to pronouns, verb tenses, and character names are allowed and not counted as added words.
- Words from the original source may be repeated without being counted as added words.
- If the competitor weaves multiple sources (literature, song lyrics, prefaces, etc.) together, he or she must orally cite each one of them near the beginning of the piece.
- Dialogue from one character may be given to another character.
- A competitor may use an interpretive selection in multiple leagues during any given competitive season. The selection may be entered in only one event per tournament (e.g., either Duo or Open but not both).
- Once the competitor uses a selection (book, play, short story, etc.) in any competition in any league, that competitor may not reuse any part of the published work in subsequent years of competition. The Bible is an exception to this rule.
- The competitor may enter only one interpretive selection per event.
- The competitor must provide a script and the scanned/photocopied pages used from the original source(s) at each tournament. The title page, copyright page, and original source pages must be from the same source.
2Presentation Rules
- The competitors must identify the title(s) and author(s) near the beginning of the piece. The competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite all source(s).
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during the delivery of the speech.
- Competitors may not engage in eye contact, physical contact, or direct face-to-face interaction. The focal point must remain independent of the other competitor.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- This is a speech event, but some singing and dancing are permitted as appropriate to the piece.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitors will receive a two (2) rank penalty for the use of a written script or notes in competition.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is ten (10) minutes, including any audience reaction. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes.
Delivery
The student must perform the speech as written and approved by the Script Submission Team. Students are not permitted to ad-lib within their speech or provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff. This would allow them to use unapproved verbiage, which may create a competitive advantage. The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props
Presentation Rule #4: No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message.
Interp speeches utilize the voice, facial expressions, and actions. When a student uses items such as their hair, pockets, eyeglasses, etc., these items become incorporated into their speech as props. This is a rule violation.
3Ballot
Duo Interpretation
A plot-based literary interpretation brought to life through creative use of voice, facial expression, and movement
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Selection | ||
| Literature: Quality selection(s), plot-based, suitable for speakers, appeals to a wide-ranging audience | 1 5 | |
| Interpretation | ||
| Storyline: Well-defined beginning, climax, and resolution. Introduction provides context. Insight and understanding of the selection(s). | 1 5 | |
| Characterization: Differentiation between characters (vocal variety, facial expressions, physical portrayals). Believable and consistent characters. | 1 5 | |
| Duo Performance: Understandable setting. Effective transitions. Range of moods or emotions. Synchronized and purposeful physical movement. Balanced performance between partners. | 1 5 | |
| Delivery: Well-timed pacing and pausing. Articulation, projection, volume. | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised, professional Presentation: Creative, captivating |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
For an Interp to be original, the script and the blocking must be unique. The competitor must not copy the added words, cutting, characterization, and/or blocking of a previous speech and/or video. This removes the merit of an original presentation and creates an unfair advantage. By creating an original interpretation, the student learns to evaluate literature, vocabulary, and the art of storytelling at a higher level. The skills of storytelling and empathizing with the characters will create a well-rounded individual who can communicate with various types of people in different settings.
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Stoa Preparation Rule 3: The competitor must create a completely original interpretation of literature. Competitors may not copy the added words, cutting, and/or blocking of a previous speech and/or video.
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
Interp Sources
Valid sourcing is an issue of academic integrity. Media transcripts (sources transcribed from a live or recorded performance) are not considered valid sources as they do not appropriately and/or legally give credit to the original author(s). AI is also not regarded as a valid source. It violates Interp Rules as the competitor is not making a “completely original interpretation of literature.” For further consideration, AI is not published or copyrighted and therefore cannot be used for creating Interp scripts.
Stoa desires script approval to be simple and objective. The texts should be in the public domain, accessible to any user, and retrievable upon request. The site and literary text must be verifiable and have a publication or copyright date. An upload date alone does not satisfy this requirement.
Unacceptable Sources:
- Blogs (from any source) – A blog is defined as “a regularly updated website or web page, typically one run by an individual or small group, that is written in an informal or conversational style.”
- Media transcripts and performances – These are scripts or script selections which have been transcribed from a live or recorded performance (including theater, movies, television/radio broadcasts, webcasts, internet streaming, YouTube, etc.). Copying content or blocking is not permitted.
- Self-published scripts – These are script selections which are authored or self-published by the competitor or a previous competitor. Self-published scripts are not permitted in Duo.
- AI – If AI creates an Interp speech for the competitor, it violates Interp Rules as the competitor is not making a “completely original interpretation of literature.” For further consideration, AI is not published or copyrighted and therefore cannot be used for creating Interp scripts.
Acceptable Sources: Sources should have a publication/copyright date. To ensure your piece is approved for NITOC, you should look for a piece that has a permanent number assigned from a nationally or scholastically recognized registry unless the piece was written before 1970. (ISBN numbering system was created in 1973.)
- “LCCN” or “Library of Congress Control Number” – ID found on the pages near the copyright notice.
- “ISBN” or “International Standard Book Number” – ISBN is a number, not a bar code. Number found on the pages near the copyright notice.
- “ISSN” or “International Standard Serial Number” – ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines, and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic. ISSN should be located: preferably, in the upper right corner of the cover; or on the pages near the copyright notice. For a publication in electronic media, the ISSN should be shown on the homepage or on the main menu, if it is an online publication.
- “DOI” or “Digital Object Identifier” – DOI provides a persistent link to its location on the Internet. All DOI numbers begin with a 10 and contain a prefix and a suffix separated by a slash. DOI is typically located on the first page of the electronic journal article, near the copyright notice.
Online Sources
Published Online Sources must have:
- Title Page (if available, screenshots are acceptable)
- Copyright/Publication date
- Author
Your online source will NOT be accepted if any of the following apply:
- It has an upload or posted date rather than a publication or copyright date.
- There is no name or contact information for the publisher.
- It has a Copyright Acknowledgment date rather than a Copyright date.
- It is in an editable format. Sources that use editable formats (i.e., Gutenberg Press) will not be accepted.
- It is a YouTube (or other visual media) transcript.
Remember: POSTED does not equal PUBLISHED.
Archive.org is a great resource for finding verifiable sources for scripts.
Citations
Why Cite Your Sources: Citing your sources is important for several reasons.
- It gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your speech.
- It gives credibility (ethos) to you as a speechwriter who did your due diligence in researching your speech. It also allows you to “borrow” the credibility of the sources you use.
- It allows those who hear your speech to identify your sources in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your speech.
- Citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your speech writing.
Duo Interpretation Rules
- Preparation Rule #5: If the competitor weaves multiple sources (literature, song lyrics, prefaces, etc.) together, he or she must orally cite each one of them near the beginning of the piece.
- Presentation Rule #1: The competitors must identify the title(s) and author(s) near the beginning of the piece. The competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite all source(s). See the Interpretation Standards.
How to Cite in Your Introduction: 1. Identify your source(s) orally for your audience. Example B includes music lyrics.
- a. Example: “This is the story of Piglet Meets a Heffalump and Eeyore Loses a Tail by A.A. Milne.”
- b. Example: “Anne of Green Gables, by L.M. Montgomery and Blest Be the Tie that Binds, by John Fawcett.”
2. Bible Sources (Quoted) – When using the Bible as a source in an interp, be sure to name the version, book, chapter(s), and verse(s), if applicable.
- a. Example: “From Jonah Chapters 1 through 4 from the King James Bible.”
What NOT to Do:
- Leave citations out. This violates Stoa’s Plagiarism policy and may result in disqualification or penalties.
- Sing in your speech and not attribute credit if the words are not already in the source(s).
- Avoid asking for help. If you are unsure if you are citing your sources correctly, ask a parent, coach, or a Speech Committee member.
- Use AI to create or generate your Interp event. AI is also not regarded as a valid source. It violates Interp Rules as the competitor is not making a “completely original interpretation of literature.” For further consideration, AI is not published or copyrighted and therefore cannot be used for creating Interp scripts.
Script Submission
Limiting added words encourages the use of the original source/literature, increasing the academic rigor of the event. Students who do not abide by the added word limit create an unfair advantage. Having the local and NITOC Script Reviewers confirm the added word count is vital to ensure that checkmarks are awarded fairly.
The student must submit the script in two parts:
- A typewritten script and
- A scanned, photocopied or screenshot of the original source with all added words inserted in the appropriate places.
Typewritten version:
- The typewritten script should be typed exactly as it is going to be presented.
- All added words, not in the original source, must be underlined.
Scanned/Photocopied version:
- Scan/photocopy every original source page which includes words used in the interpretive piece. (The original source(s) is the book, play, anthology, etc. from which the piece is taken.)
- Scan/photocopy the title page of the original source(s)
- Scan/photocopy the copyright page with the publication date of the original source(s).
- Highlight all original source words that are used in the script. Do not cross out any words.
- Insert the introduction and any added words in the appropriate spot in the script. (Joining together disconnected words from the source to create new thoughts or ideas is counted as added words.)
- Arrange the pages in the order they will be presented.
- Screenshots – Students who have secured their literary piece from an internet site must create a computer screenshot of the publication date. In addition, one page should include words from their piece to show the internet source of the piece. The screenshot should include any sidebars, headings, etc., that are a part of the computer screen, including the URL of the website. The remaining screenshots only need to contain the portions of the text used. The screenshots will be compiled in exactly the same way the scanned/photocopied pages are to be compiled. Title and publication information are still required.
Note – The goal is to submit two complete copies. One is typed. The other is scanned/photocopied from the original source with all added words inserted, creating a second complete script. The two scripts will read exactly the same.
Note regarding reproductions of copyright materials: The Fair Use Doctrine contained in the Copyright Act gives students permission to use or reproduce portions of a copyrighted work if the work is used as part of a student’s education. Therefore, the Fair Use Doctrine allows for the reproduction of portions of a copyrighted work for script submissions. However, the Fair Use Doctrine is broader than the Stoa Publication Guidelines. Please be sure your source complies with the Interp Script Submission Guideline.
Interp Preparation Video
For succinct instructions on creating the Script Copy and Original Source Copy of the scripts, see the Rapid Review and Approve Video.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
- The competitors must identify the title(s) and author(s) near the beginning of the piece. The competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite all source(s).
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during the delivery of the speech.
- Competitors may not engage in eye contact, physical contact, or direct face-to-face interaction. The focal point must remain independent of the other competitor.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- This is a speech event, but some singing and dancing are permitted as appropriate to the piece.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitors will receive a two (2) rank penalty for the use of a written script or notes in competition.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is ten (10) minutes, including any audience reaction. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Ten (10) Minutes.
Open Interpretation
Last updated August 30, 2026
Open Interpretation is an original rendition by the competitor from published or unpublished literature and/or self-written work. The presentation may range from dramatic to humorous genres, and it may include narrative storytelling, single voice monologues, or thematic compilations.
To select and analyze written work(s), then bring it/them to life through the creative use of voice, movement, and facial expression.
Speaking Time – Six (6) Minutes
As a Christian community, Stoa’s mission is “to equip homeschool students, through competitive speech and debate, to think critically, engage graciously, and speak boldly from a Biblical worldview.” In line with this mission, Stoa requires competitors to craft their speeches through the lens of Philippians 4:8, centering on that which is “good, right, honorable, and just.” We do not shy away from difficult topics, but we believe that when these are presented, they should include redemptive value, with the goal of maintaining a God-honoring atmosphere.
Competitors must avoid content that disturbs or is sensationalized primarily for shock value. If a speech contains material that is not family-friendly, the competitor must provide a concise content warning and dismiss children in the room before beginning the speech.
1Preparation Rules
- Interpretive literature may come from a wide variety of sources including original works by the competitor, published works, and/or unpublished works by others.
- The following unpublished works are not permitted: blogs and media transcripts (i.e., movie scripts and audio or video recordings that are not published in written form by the owner).
- The competitor must create a completely original interpretation of literature. Competitors may not copy the added words, cutting, and/or blocking of a previous speech and/or video.
- There is no limit to the number of words added.
- If the competitor weaves multiple sources (literature, song lyrics, prefaces, etc.) together, he or she must orally cite each one of them near the beginning of the piece.
- Dialogue from one character may be given to another character.
- A competitor may use an interpretive selection in multiple leagues during any given competitive season. The selection may be entered in only one event per tournament (e.g., either Literary or Open but not both).
- Once the competitor uses a selection (book, play, short story, etc.) in any competition in any league, that competitor may not reuse any part of the work in subsequent years of competition. The Bible is an exception to this rule.
- The competitor may enter only one interpretive selection per event.
- The competitor must provide a script and scanned/photocopied pages used from all original source(s) at each tournament. The title page, copyright page, and original source pages must be from the same source. See the Script Submission Form.
2Presentation Rules
- The competitor will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite all source(s). The author(s) and title(s) of the presentation must be introduced near the beginning of the piece even if it is an original piece written by the competitor. Adaptations must include the name of the original author as well as the names of all other contributing authors.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during the delivery of the speech.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- This is a speech event, but some singing and dancing are permitted as appropriate to the piece.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for use of a written script or notes in competition.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is six (6) minutes, including any audience reaction. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Six (6) Minutes
Delivery
The student must perform the speech as written and approved by the Script Submission Team. Students are not permitted to ad-lib within their speech or provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff. This would allow them to use unapproved verbiage, which may create a competitive advantage. The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props
Presentation Rule #3: No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message.
Interp speeches utilize the voice, facial expressions, and actions. When a student uses items such as their hair, pockets, eyeglasses, etc., these items become incorporated into their speech as props. This is a rule violation.
3Ballot
Open Interpretation
An interpretation brought to life through creative use of voice, movement, and facial expression
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Selection | ||
| Literature: Quality selection(s) (monologue, poetry, story, etc.). Appeals to wide-ranging audience. Suitable for speaker. | 1 5 | |
| Interpretation | ||
| Storyline: Clear development of character, story, or theme. Introduction provides context. Insight and understanding of the selection. | 1 5 | |
| Characterization: Distinction of character(s) (vocal variety, facial expressions, physical portrayals). Believable and consistent character(s). | 1 5 | |
| Performance: Understandable setting. Effective transitions. Range of moods or emotions. Purposeful physical movement. | 1 5 | |
| Delivery: Well-timed pacing and pausing. Articulation, projection, volume. | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised, professional Presentation: Creative, captivating |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
For an Interp to be original, the script and the blocking must be unique. The competitor must not copy the added words, cutting, characterization, and/or blocking of a previous speech and/or video. This removes the merit of an original presentation and creates an unfair advantage. By creating an original interpretation, the student learns to evaluate literature, vocabulary, and the art of storytelling at a higher level. The skills of storytelling and empathizing with the characters will create a well-rounded individual who can communicate with various types of people in different settings.
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Stoa Preparation Rule 3: The competitor must create a completely original interpretation of literature. Competitors may not copy the added words, cutting, and/or blocking of a previous speech and/or video.
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the body of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
Interp Sources
Valid sourcing is an issue of academic integrity. Media transcripts (sources transcribed from a live or recorded performance) are not considered valid sources as they do not appropriately and/or legally give credit to the original author(s). AI is also not regarded as a valid source. It violates Interp Rules as the competitor is not making a “completely original interpretation of literature.” For further consideration, AI is not published or copyrighted and therefore cannot be used for creating Interp scripts.
Stoa desires script approval to be simple and objective. The texts should be in the public domain, accessed universally by any user, and retrievable upon request. The site and literary text must be verifiable and have a publication or copyright date. An upload date alone does not satisfy this requirement.
Unacceptable Sources:
- Blogs (from any source) – A blog is defined as “a regularly updated website or web page, typically one run by an individual or small group, that is written in an informal or conversational style.”
- Media transcripts and performances – These are scripts or script selections which have been transcribed from a live or recorded performance (including theater, movies, television/radio broadcasts, webcasts, internet streaming, YouTube, etc.). Copying content or blocking is not permitted.
- AI – If AI creates an Interp speech for the competitor, it violates Interp Rules as the competitor is not making a “completely original interpretation of literature.” While it is permissible to use an unpublished piece, it is not permissible to use anything written or created by AI for Open Interpretation.
Acceptable Sources:
- Self-published or self written scripts – These are script selections which are authored or self-published by the competitor or a previous competitor. Self-published scripts are permitted in Open Interpretation.
- Published sources should have a publication/copyright date. To ensure your piece is approved for NITOC, you should look for a piece that has a permanent number assigned from a nationally or scholastically recognized registry unless the piece was written before 1970. (ISBN numbering system was created in 1973.)
- “LCCN” or “Library of Congress Control Number” – ID found on the pages near the copyright notice.
- “ISBN” or “International Standard Book Number” – ISBN is a number, not a bar code. Number found on the pages near the copyright notice.
- “ISSN” or “International Standard Serial Number” – ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines, and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic. ISSN should be located: preferably, in the upper right corner of the cover; or on the pages near the copyright notice. For a publication in electronic media, the ISSN should be shown on the homepage or on the main menu, if it is an online publication.
- “DOI” or “Digital Object Identifier” – DOI provides a persistent link to its location on the Internet. All DOI numbers begin with a 10 and contain a prefix and a suffix separated by a slash. DOI is typically located on the first page of the electronic journal article, near the copyright notice.
Online Sources
Published Online Sources must have:
- Title Page (if available, screenshots are acceptable)
- Copyright/Publication date
- Author
Your online source will NOT be accepted if any of the following apply:
- It has an upload or posted date rather than a publication or copyright date.
- There is no name or contact information for the publisher.
- It has a Copyright Acknowledgment date rather than a Copyright date.
- It is in an editable format. Sources that use editable formats (i.e., Gutenberg Press) will not be accepted.
- It is a YouTube (or other visual media) transcript.
Remember: POSTED does not equal PUBLISHED.
Archive.org is a great resource for finding verifiable sources for scripts.
Citations
Why Cite Your Sources: Citing your sources is important for several reasons.
- It gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your speech.
- It gives credibility (ethos) to you as a speechwriter who did your due diligence in researching your speech. It also allows you to “borrow” the credibility of the sources you use.
- It allows those who hear your speech to identify your sources in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your speech.
- Citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your speech writing.
Open Interpretation Rules
- Preparation Rule #5: If the competitor weaves multiple sources (literature, song lyrics, prefaces, etc.) together, he or she must orally cite each one of them near the beginning of the piece.
- Presentation Rule #1: The competitors must identify the title(s) and author(s) near the beginning of the piece. The competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite all source(s). See the Interpretation Standards.
How to Cite in Your Script: 1. Identify your source(s) orally for your audience. Example A includes music lyrics.
- a. Example: “Based on the book Fanny Crosby, The Blind Girl’s Song, by Lucille Travis and two hymns by Fanny entitled, Safe in the Arms of Jesus and Jesus is Tenderly Calling.”
- b. Example: “This is the story of Piglet Meets a Heffalump and Eeyore Loses a Tail by A.A. Milne.”
- c. Example: “Anne of Green Gables, by L.M. Montgomery.”
2. Bible Sources (Quoted) – When using the Bible as a source in an interp, be sure to name the version, book, chapter(s), and verse(s), if applicable.
- a. Example: “From Jonah Chapters 1 through 4 from the King James Bible.”
3. Bible Sources (Adapted) – When a story from the Bible is adapted for an Open Interp, the title of the book in the Bible being interpreted must be included. You must also indicate that you are adapting the story in your own words.
- a. Example: “This is the story of Jonah, adapted by (your name).”
- b. Example: “This is the story of David and Goliath, from I Samuel, adapted by (your name).”
What NOT to Do:
- Leave citations out. This violates Stoa’s Plagiarism policy and may result in disqualification or penalties.
- Sing in your speech and not attribute credit if the words are not already in the source(s).
- Avoid asking for help. If you are unsure if you are citing your sources correctly, ask a parent, coach, or a Speech Committee member.
- Use AI to create or generate your Interp event. AI is also not regarded as a valid source. It violates Interp Rules as the competitor is not making a “completely original interpretation of literature.” For further consideration, AI is not published or copyrighted and therefore cannot be used for creating Interp scripts.
Script Submission
The student must submit the script in two parts, if using any script other than entirely self-written. Remember, students must give credit for any work used by another author.
- A typewritten script and
- A scanned, photocopied or screenshot of the original source with all added words inserted in the appropriate places.
Typewritten version: (If entirely self-written, only typed version is required.)
- The typewritten script should be typed exactly as it is going to be presented.
- All added words, not in the original source, must be underlined.
Scanned/Photocopied version:
- Scan/photocopy every original source page which includes words used in the interpretive piece. (The original source(s) is the book, play, anthology, etc. from which the piece is taken.)
- Scan/photocopy the title page of the original source(s).
- Scan/photocopy the copyright page with the publication date of the original source(s).
- Highlight all original source words that are used in the script. Do not cross out any words.
- Insert the introduction and any added words in the appropriate spot in the script.
- Arrange the pages in the order they will be presented.
- Screenshots – Students who have secured their literary piece from an internet site must create a computer screenshot of the publication date. In addition, one page should include words from their piece to show the internet source of the piece. The screenshot should include any sidebars, headings, etc., that are a part of the computer screen, including the URL of the website. The remaining screenshots only need to contain the portions of the text used. The screenshots will be compiled in exactly the same way the scanned/photocopied pages are to be compiled. Title and publication information is still required.
Note – The goal is to submit two complete copies. One is typed. The other is scanned/photocopied from the original source with all added words inserted, creating a second complete script. The two scripts will read exactly the same.
Note regarding reproductions of copyright materials: The Fair Use Doctrine contained in the Copyright Act gives students permission to use or reproduce portions of a copyrighted work if the work is used as part of a student’s education. Therefore, the Fair Use Doctrine allows for the reproduction of portions of a copyrighted work for script submissions. Please be sure your source complies with the Interp Script Submission Guidelines.
Interp Preparation Video
For succinct instructions on creating the Script Copy and Original Source Copy of the scripts, see the Rapid Review and Approve Video.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
- The competitor will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite all source(s). The author(s) and title(s) of the presentation must be introduced near the beginning of the piece even if it is an original piece written by the competitor. Adaptations must include the name of the original author as well as the names of all other contributing authors.
- Competitors may not receive or access any verbal, non-verbal, electronic, and/or written communication, nor any form of visual assistance during the delivery of the speech.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- This is a speech event, but some singing and dancing are permitted as appropriate to the piece.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for use of a written script or notes in competition.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is six (6) minutes, including any audience reaction. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Six (6) Minutes
Storytelling
Wildcard Event · 2026-2027 Season · Last updated August 31, 2026
Storytelling is a limited preparation event in which the competitor chooses a story from the genre or category selected by the tournament. Competitors then prepare to tell the story in their own words.
To understand the values and techniques inherent in good storytelling and to be able to recreate stories for the education and enjoyment of the audience.
Speaking Time – Eight (8) Minutes
As a Christian community, Stoa’s mission is “to equip homeschool students, through competitive speech and debate, to think critically, engage graciously, and speak boldly from a Biblical worldview.” In line with this mission, Stoa requires competitors to craft their speeches through the lens of Philippians 4:8, centering on that which is “good, right, honorable, and just.” We do not shy away from difficult topics, but we believe that when these are presented, they should include redemptive value, with the goal of maintaining a God-honoring atmosphere.
Competitors must avoid content that disturbs or is sensationalized primarily for shock value. If a speech contains material that is not family-friendly, the competitor must provide a concise content warning and dismiss children in the room before beginning the speech.
1Preparation Rules
- Each tournament will choose a type or category of story based on the preference of the Tournament Director (e.g., folk tales, war stories, family history, Bible stories, etc.). The tournament may make the category as general or as specific as desired (e.g., “Folktales” or “Celtic Folktales from the 17th Century”; “Animal Stories” or “Stories about Dogs”). The tournament must post the category on the fourteenth day before the start of the tournament.
- The competitor will have two weeks to prepare, edit, or adapt the story in any way.
- The selection may be entered in only one category per tournament (e.g., either Storytelling or Open Interpretation but not both). The competitor may later place the selection in a different category in subsequent tournaments (e.g., a Storytelling piece may be used later as an Open Interpretation).
- The competitor may not use the selection again in Storytelling in subsequent tournaments; each story must be unique and exclusive to each tournament.
- Competitors must use the same selected story for each round at a tournament.
- The competitor may use multiple selections (books, short stories, plays) to craft their story. Once the competitor uses a selection in any competition in any league, that competitor may not reuse it in Storytelling for that competition year. The Bible and anthologies are an exception to this rule.
- The competitor must submit their source on the Storytelling section of the Compliance Tool before the tournament. This will include the title of the story and its source. The form may be accessed on the Compliance Tool. The Compliance Tool will maintain a list of all the stories and sources the competitor has used during the 2026-27 season.
2Presentation Rules
- The competitor will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite the source(s) in the introduction.
- Competitors may not bring any notes with them nor may they receive any form of assistance during the delivery of the speech.
- The tournament will provide a chair that the presenter may use; however, no other props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- This is primarily a speech event, but some singing and dancing are permitted as appropriate.
- The story is told in the words of the competitor, and that wording may change from round to round and audience to audience. Exact verbatim memory is not required or encouraged. The story should have an element of spontaneity.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is eight (8) minutes, including any audience reaction. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Eight (8) Minutes
Delivery
The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props
Presentation Rule #3: The tournament will provide a chair that the presenter may use; however, no other props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
The tournament will provide a chair for the student’s use in each Storytelling competition room. The student may use the chair in any way that would further impact their story. Throwing the chair or causing any damage to the chair is strictly prohibited. The student is not guaranteed a specific type of chair. It could be a metal folding chair, a children’s chair, or a boardroom chair. There is no rule for what kind of chair will be provided.
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message.
Storytelling speeches utilize the voice, facial expressions, and actions. When a student uses items such as their hair, pockets, eyeglasses, etc., these items become incorporated into their speech as props. This is a rule violation.
3Ballot
Storytelling
A limited preparation presentation of a story told in the competitor’s own words from the genre or category selected by the tournament
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Selection | ||
| Story Choice: Compelling choice. Appeals to wide-ranging audience. Memorable adaption. Suitable for speaker. | 1 5 | |
| Presentation | ||
| Content: Clear beginning, climax, and resolution. Introduction provides context. Skillfully crafted narrative. Effectively provides insight and understanding to the genre. | 1 5 | |
| Performance: Variety of vocal and facial expressions. Vivid language. Simple physical movement. Unscripted, fresh delivery. | 1 5 | |
| Tone: Suitable energy and appropriate emotion. Captures the correct mood. | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised, professional Presentation: Artistic, captivating |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Speeches may not be written by AI, in part or in full. The competitor must create a completely original presentation. All Storytelling speeches must be told in the student’s authentic and unique voice. The story should have an element of spontaneity.
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the introduction of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
Citations
Why Cite Your Sources: Citing your sources is important for several reasons.
- It gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your speech.
- It gives credibility (ethos) to you as a speechwriter who did your due diligence in researching your speech. It also allows you to “borrow” the credibility of the sources you use.
- It allows those who hear your speech to identify your sources in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your speech.
- Citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your speech writing.
Presentation Rule #1: The competitor will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite the source(s) in the introduction.
How to Cite in Your Script:
1. Identify your source(s) orally for your audience. Example A includes music lyrics.
- a. Example: “Based on the book Fanny Crosby, The Blind Girl’s Song, by Lucille Travis and two hymns by Fanny entitled Safe in the Arms of Jesus and Jesus is Tenderly Calling.”
- b. Example: “This is the story of George Washington from Ingri D’Aulaire and Edgar Parin D’Aulaire.”
- c. Example: “Anne of Green Gables, by L.M. Montgomery.”
2. Bible Sources (Quoted) – When using the Bible as a source in an interp, be sure to name the version, book, chapter(s), and verse(s), if applicable.
- a. Example: “From Jonah Chapters 1 through 4 from the King James Bible.”
- b. Example: “This is the story of David and Goliath, from I Samuel.”
What NOT to Do:
- Leave out your source in the introduction. This violates Stoa’s Plagiarism policy and may result in disqualification or penalties.
- Sing in your speech and not attribute credit if the words are not already in the source(s).
- Avoid asking for help. If you are unsure if you are citing your sources correctly, ask a parent, coach, or a Speech Committee member.
- Use AI to write your story. The competitor must create a completely original presentation. All Storytelling speeches must be told in the student’s authentic and unique voice. The story should have an element of spontaneity.
Script Submission
Purpose: While there is no script to submit in Storytelling, it is required that students log their source. Unless using the Bible or an anthology, students are only allowed to use a source(s) once per competitive season. This increases the event’s academic rigor. Having the local and NITOC Script Reviewers confirm the source(s) is vital to ensure that checkmarks are awarded fairly.
- The competitor must submit their source on the Storytelling section of the Compliance Tool before the tournament.
- Title and Author will be required.
- Competitors must use the same selected story for each round at a tournament.
- The competitor may use multiple selections (books, short stories, plays) to craft their story. Once the competitor uses a selection in any competition in any league, that competitor may not reuse it in Storytelling for that competition year. The Bible and anthologies are an exception to this rule.
- The Compliance Tool will maintain a list of all the stories and sources the competitor has used during the 2026-27 season.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
- The competitor will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite the source(s) in the introduction.
- Competitors may not bring any notes with them nor may they receive any form of assistance during the delivery of the speech.
- The tournament will provide a chair that the presenter may use; however, no other props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- This is primarily a speech event, but some singing and dancing are permitted as appropriate.
- The story is told in the words of the competitor, and that wording may change from round to round and audience to audience. Exact verbatim memory is not required or encouraged. The story should have an element of spontaneity.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is eight (8) minutes, including any audience reaction. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by 15 seconds or more.
Speaking Time – Eight (8) Minutes
Slam Poetry
Wildcard Event · 2026-2027 Season · Last updated August 30, 2026
Using a poem or a selection of poems, a speaker will convey a single theme through an expressionistic and engaging presentation that portrays the artistic language and meaning of the poetry.
To select and/or write poetry and then bring the meaning to life to an audience through creative expression.
Speaking Time Five (5) Minutes
As a Christian community, Stoa’s mission is “to equip homeschool students, through competitive speech and debate, to think critically, engage graciously, and speak boldly from a Biblical worldview.” In line with this mission, Stoa requires competitors to craft their speeches through the lens of Philippians 4:8, centering on that which is “good, right, honorable, and just.” We do not shy away from difficult topics, but we believe that when these are presented, they should include redemptive value, with the goal of maintaining a God-honoring atmosphere.
Competitors must avoid content that disturbs or is sensationalized primarily for shock value. If a speech contains material that is not family-friendly, the competitor must provide a concise content warning and dismiss children in the room before beginning the speech.
1Preparation Rules
- Poem selections may come from a wide variety of sources, including original works by the competitor, published works, and/or unpublished works.
- All words that are not self-authored must be cited parenthetically in the script and documented on the citation page to avoid plagiarism; however, they need not be orally cited after they are identified in the introduction.
- Unpublished works, including videos that are not published and posted by the author, must have written permission by the author; a copy of this permission must be included with the script.
- The competitor must create a completely original presentation. Competitors may not copy the added words, cutting, and/or blocking of a previous speech and/or video.
- The selection(s) must be edited to conform to a unified theme and the time limit.
- The competitor may weave multiple sources together around a common theme.
- The competitor must create an introduction that names the title(s) and author(s) of the poem(s) or borrowed words used within the speech.
- The competitor may use an unlimited amount of added words to transition between poems but must keep the speech focused on the poetry, not the exposition or analysis of the poem(s).
- A competitor may use this selection in multiple leagues during any given competitive season. This selection may be entered in only one event per tournament (e.g., either Poetry or Open but not both).
- Once the competitor uses a selection in any competition in any league, that competitor may not reuse any part of the speech in subsequent years of competition. The Bible is an exception to this rule.
- The competitor may enter only one speech per event.
- The competitor must provide a script and a citation page at each tournament, along with the completed Slam Poetry Script Submission Form.
2Presentation Rules
- Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the introduction. The competitor will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite the source(s) in the introduction. This includes self-authored poems. Use of another person’s or source’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- Competitors may not receive any form of assistance during the delivery of the speech.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- Singing is not permitted.
- Audience members may participate in the presentation through clapping, snapping, or other non-verbal interaction; however, audience participation should not detract from the speaker or the speech.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for the use of a written script or notes in competition.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is five (5) minutes, including any audience reaction. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by fifteen seconds or more.
Speaking Time Five (5) Minutes
Delivery
The student must perform the speech as written and approved by the Script Submission Team. Students are not permitted to ad-lib within their speech or provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff. This would allow them to use unapproved verbiage, which may create a competitive advantage. The speech must be contained within the timer’s start and stop.
Upon arrival in the competition room, students may greet judges and ask questions or make brief comments to the judge before the speech (e.g., about the timer placement, whether they are ready to start, etc.).
Before their speech, students may not speak to the judges, provide a summary, or make any preemptive comments about their speech or topic. The only exception is for a content warning if necessary.
After their speech, students may thank their judges for listening and shake their hands, but may not continue their speech by thanking the judges in a way that extends their theme or refers to their topic.
Props
Presentation Rule #3: No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
A prop is a tangible object which is displayed or handled by a competitor to enhance the speaker’s message. Stoa encourages authentic gestures and facial expressions in speech delivery. However, when a feature that is on or part of the student’s body or clothing is used to visually enhance the speech as support or evidence, it becomes a prop and is not permitted.
3Ballot
Slam Poetry
A thematic presentation of poetry that brings the meaning to life through creative expression
| Evaluate 1 (poor) ... 5 (excellent) | Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Selection | ||
| Poetry: Quality selection(s) (classic, modern, non-traditional, self-written). Appeals to wide-ranging audience. Suitable for speaker. | 1 5 | |
| Presentation | ||
| Content: Introduction provides context. Concludes poetically. Clear development of theme. Insight and understanding of the selection(s). | 1 5 | |
| Performance: Understandable language. Conveys meaning of poetry and theme. Appropriate rhythm and beat. Meaningful vocal, facial, and physical expression. | 1 5 | |
| Delivery: Well-timed pacing and pausing. Articulation, projection, volume. | 1 5 | |
| Overall Impression | ||
| Appearance: Poised, professional Poetic Portrayal: Creative, captivating |
1 5 | |
4Sourcing, Citations & Script Submission
Plagiarism Policy
The Stoa Speech and Debate League does not allow plagiarism in any competitive event. Every competitor is responsible for ensuring that they do not engage in plagiarism in any form. If competitor(s) are found to have engaged in plagiarism during competition, tournament officials may take appropriate action against the competitor(s).
What is plagiarism? 1. To steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own. 2. To present as new and original an idea derived from an existing source ~ Merriam Webster
Forms of plagiarism include:
- verbatim (directly quoting another source’s words)
- paraphrasing (rewriting another source’s ideas or words without citing the source)
- patchwork (incorporating phrases or sentences from multiple sources without credit)
- self (reusing your own previously-submitted work in a new event)
- global (purchasing, stealing, or commissioning an entire paper or speech and representing it as your own)
- source-based (citing a fake source, fabricating data, or citing a primary source when you actually pulled from a secondary source)
Speeches may not be written by AI, in part or in full. All Slam Poetry speeches must be written in the student’s authentic and unique voice.
Preparation Rule 1: Poem selections may come from a wide variety of sources, including original works by the competitor, published works, and/or unpublished works.
- a. All words that are not self-authored must be cited parenthetically in the script and documented on the citation page to avoid plagiarism; however, they need not be orally cited after they are identified in the introduction.
- b. Unpublished works, including videos that are not published and posted by the author, must have written permission by the author; a copy of this permission must be included with the script. See the Slam Poetry Standards.
Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the introduction of the speech. Use of another person’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
The competitor must create a completely original presentation. Competitors may not copy the cutting, and/or blocking of a previous speech and/or video.
Common Knowledge
While many students have acquired knowledge through their studies and hobbies, not all of it is common to the average person. Thus, detailed knowledge must be cited. This includes dates, statistics, technical information, and facts that the listener would only know if they had researched the topic. When in doubt, cite the source. For more information, see the article from MIT titled “What Is Common Knowledge?”.
AI and Slam Poetry
All Slam Poetry speeches must be written in the student’s authentic and unique voice. AI may not compose or generate a competitor’s original work. All words that are not self-authored must be cited parenthetically in the script and documented on the citation page to avoid plagiarism; however, they need not be orally cited after they are identified in the introduction. Be aware that any quotes garnered from AI must be cited from the original source (not from AI). AI is not considered a reliable source for accurate quotes and statistics.
Sources
Unpublished Sources: Slam Poetry pieces will need written permission if unpublished by the owner.
Unpublished sources for Slam Poetry include videos that are not published by the author. Examples include videos posted on YouTube, GodTube, Button Poetry, TikTok, or other media sources outside the author’s channel or website. Poetry found on unpublished videos must include written permission from the author.
Published Online Sources must have:
- Copyright/Publication date
- Author
Your online source will NOT be accepted if any of the following apply:
- It has an upload or posted date rather than a publication or copyright date.
- There is no name or contact information for the publisher.
- It has a Copyright Acknowledgment date rather than a Copyright date.
- It is in an editable format. Sources that use editable formats (i.e., Gutenberg Press) will not be accepted.
- It is a YouTube (or other visual media) transcript.
Remember: POSTED does not equal PUBLISHED.
Archive.org is a great resource for finding verifiable sources for scripts.
Underlining and In-Text Citation
Script submission for Slam Poetry contains aspects from both Interp and Platform Submission.
Like Interp Submissions:
- The student must submit a typewritten copy of the speech. The script should be typed exactly as it will be presented.
- All sources and authors must be orally cited in the introduction near the beginning of the speech, including self-authored poems.
Like Platform Submissions:
- All direct quotations must be underlined, and in-text (parenthetical) citations must be added after direct quotations.
- A Citation Page must be created on a separate page at the end of the speech. All sources must be included on the Citation Page.
The Rapid Review and Approve video provides basic Interp and Platform instructions that may be helpful.
Citations
Why Cite Your Sources: Citing your sources, whether in a platform or interpretive speech, is important for several reasons.
- It gives proper credit to the authors of the words or ideas that you incorporated into your speech.
- It gives credibility (ethos) to you as a speech writer who did your due diligence in researching your speech. It also allows you to “borrow” the credibility of the sources you use.
- It allows those who hear your speech to identify your sources in order to learn more about the ideas that you include in your speech.
- Citing your sources consistently and accurately helps you avoid committing plagiarism in your speech writing.
Slam Poetry Rules
- Preparation #1a: Poem selections may come from a wide variety of sources, including original works by the competitor, published works, and/or unpublished works. a. All words that are not self-authored must be cited parenthetically in the script and documented on the citation page; however, they need not be orally cited after they are identified in the introduction.
- Preparation Rule #10: The competitor must provide a script and a citation page at each tournament, along with the completed Slam Poetry Script Submission Form.
- Presentation Rule #1: The competitor will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite the source(s) in the introduction. This includes self-authored poems.
How to Cite in Your Script: If you directly quote information from any source, you must:
1. Identify your source(s) orally for your audience in the introduction.
- Example: “The Raven by Edgar Allen Poe.”
- Example: “From If by Rudyard Kipling and (title of the poem) by (your name).”
2. Bible Sources – When using the Bible as a source in Slam Poetry, identify the book(s) and version(s) verbally in the introduction. If the Bible story is paraphrased, the student can introduce the piece with: the story name, the book, and the wording adapted by.
- Example: “From Psalms in the Message Bible.”
- Example: “From the books Psalms, Job, and Ephesians written in The Message, NIV and ESV versions.”
- Example: “This is the story of David and Goliath, from I Samuel, adapted by (your name).”
3. Adapted Sources – When a poem is adapted from another published story, the title of the story being adapted must be included. You must also indicate that you are adapting the story in your own words.
- a. Example: “Little Red Riding Hood by (your name) based on the original story of the same name by Charles Perrault.”
4. Cite direct quotations in the speech parenthetically to easily connect it to the source entry on your Citation Page.
- If possible, include the author’s name and the page number. i. Example: “If you can keep your head when all about you Are losing theirs and blaming it on you…” (Kipling).
- If no author is given, use the title of the work.
- Scriptural sources should include the name of the version followed by the book, chapter, and verse (if applicable). i. Example: “Oh Lord, our Lord, how majestic is Your name in all the earth!” (New International Version, Psalm 8:1).
What NOT to Do:
- Leave citations out. This violates Stoa’s Plagiarism policy and may result in disqualification or penalties.
- Avoid asking for help. If you are unsure if you are citing your sources correctly, ask a parent, coach, or a member of the Speech Committee.
- Use AI to compose your piece. All Slam Poetry speeches must be written in the student’s authentic and unique voice.
Script Submission
Purpose: Slam Poetry speech scripts should contain the exact text of the student’s speech for accountability. The sources of any contributing information must be formally cited so that credit is given where credit is due. The script preparation instructions below will assist with that process.
- The student must submit a typewritten copy of the speech. The script should be typed exactly as it will be presented.
- All sources and authors must be orally cited in the introduction near the beginning of the speech. This includes self-authored poems.
- All direct quotations must be underlined.
- In-text (parenthetical) citations must be added after direct quotations.
- A Citation Page must be created on a separate page at the end of the speech. Any format is acceptable. (Students may use www.easybib.com or other applications to assist with the Citation Page.) All sources must be included on the Citation Page.
- Unpublished works must have written permission from the author; a copy of this permission must be included with the script.
- A current Script Submission Form must be submitted with the speech script at each tournament.
5Rules for Judges
Everything a judge needs in the room: the presentation rules as printed on the tournament sheet, room administration where it applies, and the ballot in Section 3.
- Any information that comes from source material must be cited orally within the introduction. The competitor will receive a one (1) rank penalty for failure to cite the source(s) in the introduction. This includes self-authored poems. Use of another person’s or source’s words or ideas without crediting them is plagiarism and is strictly forbidden.
- Competitors may not receive any form of assistance during the delivery of the speech.
- No props, audio, or visual aids may be used.
- Only feet are permitted to touch the floor at any time.
- Vulgar, obscene, lewd, and/or graphic language and gestures are strictly prohibited.
- Singing is not permitted.
- Audience members may participate in the presentation through clapping, snapping, or other non-verbal interaction; however, audience participation should not detract from the speaker or the speech.
- The speech must be memorized and delivered as written in the script. The competitor will receive a two (2) rank penalty for the use of a written script or notes in competition.
- The timepiece must be facing toward the competitor and counting up.
- The maximum speaking time is five (5) minutes, including any audience reaction. Competitors may not provide any additional context, explanation, or commentary about their speech before or after delivery unless directed by tournament staff.
- Competitors will receive a one (1) rank penalty for going overtime by fifteen seconds or more.
Speaking Time Five (5) Minutes
Team Policy
2026-2027 Season · Last updated August 2026
A Team Policy debate asks competitors to develop and defend competing policy options to address contemporary problems. The purpose of Team Policy debate is to instill in Christian homeschool students the skills of presentation, critical thinking, research, and policy analysis. That endeavor is accomplished in an environment of honorable competition that cultivates maturity, wisdom, grace, poise, and brings glory to our Lord Jesus Christ.
1Rules
II. Policy Debate Teams
A Team Policy debate round consists of two teams—an Affirmative team and a Negative team. A policy debate team consists of two competitors. A team may not switch partners within a single tournament.
- It is the job of the affirmative team to uphold the resolution. If the affirmative is successful, they win, and the judge should vote for the resolution.
- If the affirmative fails to do so, the negative team wins, and the judge should vote accordingly.
III. The Team Policy Debate Round
A. Speech Order
Each debate round will consist of the following speeches & time limits, in order:
| 1st Affirmative Constructive (1AC) | 8 minutes |
| Cross-Examination of 1st Affirmative | 3 minutes |
| 1st Negative Constructive (1NC) | 8 minutes |
| Cross-Examination of 1st Negative | 3 minutes |
| 2nd Affirmative Constructive (2AC) | 8 minutes |
| Cross-Examination of 2nd Affirmative | 3 minutes |
| 2nd Negative Constructive (2NC) | 8 minutes |
| Cross-Examination of 2nd Negative | 3 minutes |
| 1st Negative Rebuttal (1NR) | 5 minutes |
| 1st Affirmative Rebuttal (1AR) | 5 minutes |
| 2nd Negative Rebuttal (2NR) | 5 minutes |
| 2nd Affirmative Rebuttal (2AR) | 5 minutes |
B. Speaker Position
Speaker position must be maintained throughout the round by all four debaters on both teams.
- The 1AC speaker must deliver the 1AR.
- The 2AC speaker must deliver the 2AR.
- The 1NC speaker must deliver the 1NR.
- The 2NC speaker must deliver the 2NR.
C. Speech Purpose
- Constructive speeches may be used to introduce, build, and respond to arguments.
- Rebuttal speeches are used to respond to and extend existing lines of argumentation and to emphasize the most important issues in the round.
- No new lines of argumentation may be presented in rebuttal speeches. Rebuttal speeches may include new evidence, examples, analysis, and analogies offered to support previously introduced lines of argumentation.
- If a team introduces a new line of argumentation into the round during the rebuttals, the judge should disregard these arguments when evaluating the round.
D. Time Limits
- Time begins when the debater begins speaking, both for speeches and cross-examination.
- If a debater fails to use all their time, the remaining time is discarded and cannot be converted into extra time for some other component of the round.
- Once time has expired at the end of a speech or cross-examination, a speaker may be allowed to complete a sentence, but should not start a new thought.
- Once time has expired, judges are free to disregard additional comments or speech content when evaluating the round.
- In the event that debaters are required to self-time, the speaker must set the timer to countdown and to provide an audible alarm when time has expired. The speaker may not turn off the alarm and continue talking.
- During the debate, electronic devices may only be used for timing. They may not be used to send or receive information from any source. A stand-alone calculator is allowed.
E. Cross-Examination
- The cross-examination starts after the completion of each constructive speech.
- Each debater will interrogate once and respond once in the course of the round as follows.
- The 1AC is questioned by the 2nd Negative Speaker.
- The 1NC is questioned by the 1st Affirmative Speaker
- The 2AC is questioned by the 1st Negative Speaker
- The 2NC is questioned by the 2nd Affirmative Speaker
F. Preparation Time
- Each team has a total budget of 5 minutes of preparation time that can be used or discarded as desired by the teams.
- If preparation time is to be taken, it begins after the completion of a speech or cross-examination.
- The budget of the team giving the next speech is charged.
- Preparation time between a constructive speech and cross-examination is not allowed.
G. Individual Presentation and Team Preparation
- A debater may not accept verbal prompting or written materials from their partner when at the lectern.
- Debaters may freely communicate and pass notes when at the prep table together.
- During an opponent’s speech, interaction with one’s partner should be discreet and avoid disrupting the speaker’s ability to communicate with the judge.
H. Support
- Team Policy Debate makes use of a wide variety of support to defend and clarify arguments, which may include (but is not limited to) logic, definitions, quotations, facts, examples, applications, analogies, cited material, and other relevant information.
- Debaters are responsible for all information presented in the round. Misrepresentation or fabrication of articles, authors, sources, or any other information in the round is strictly prohibited.
- Evidence (a subset of support) is the oral verbatim reading of quoted text as well as an accompanying citation from a particular source that is publicly available.
- Evidence must be physically present, on paper, in the debate room, and must include sufficient context to verify the intent of the quote, at a minimum, the complete paragraph from which it is taken.
- The written source citation must include:
- All authors (if available).
- Publication name.
- Complete date (if an internet source does not include a publication date, then the date of the last website update and the date accessed should be included).
- URL (if available).
- Page number, if from a printed source.
- The citation is located directly above or below the quoted text. (If quoting from a book, a bookmark, notecard, or other notation should be used to place the full citation next to the quoted text.)
- Evidence must be read verbatim from the first word of the sentence to the ending punctuation without redaction or addition.
- Information in parentheses may only be orally omitted when it does not change the meaning of the quotation. Information in parentheses must remain within the printed quotation.
- When citing information from a dictionary or legal statute (e.g., U.S. Code, the Constitution), a single clause may be considered a complete sentence.
- A chart, graph, or table may not be displayed, and the data contained in a chart, graph, or table may be used as evidence only by the oral verbatim reading of the labels, values, units, and any accompanying text as they appear in the source. A debater may choose to read the data points deemed relevant to the round, rather than every value, provided the selection does not misrepresent the figure.
- Evidence may not be pieced together from non-contiguous sentences of an article. Non-contiguous sentences from the same article need to either be cited as separate pieces of evidence, or identified orally that sentences or sections were skipped (e.g. “later in the article”).
- Ellipses may not be added by the debater, but may be included if part of the original material.
- Evidence presented by a debater must be consistent with the intent of the source piece.
- Evidence, including adequate context for the evidence, must be made available if requested by the other team or the judge, as the team presenting the evidence has the burden of validating that evidence if challenged.
- When evaluating the round, the judge is free to disregard any evidence presented which is found to be deficient in any aspect described above.
- Judicial Review—if the judge desires to review any evidence presented in the round, this request must wait until the round is over, and must be at the initiative and direction of the judge.
- Judges may review only the evidence debaters read aloud during the round. This review may extend to unread portions when those portions are included to demonstrate the author’s intent.
- Debaters may not extend or explain arguments during the review.
- Debaters may not attempt to provide the judge with evidence before, during, or after the round. Debaters are free to refer orally to the judge’s right to review evidence, both in speeches and in cross-examination.
- Debaters may not display “props” to the judge at any point in the round. A “prop” is defined as an object that substitutes an oral communication with a visual depiction for the perpetuation of a narrative.
I. The Judge
- Stoa acknowledges the judge as the “first line of defense” for all rule infractions, ethical questions, irregularities, and disciplinary issues.
- The judge is at liberty to use all aspects of the round to reach a conclusion regarding the ballot.
- In confusing or flagrant situations, the judge should seek guidance from the judge orientation staff or tournament leadership.
- If manipulation, misrepresentation, fabrication of evidence, or gross negligence under evidence rules is suspected, it should be brought to the attention of tournament leadership once the round is completed.
- Ignorance of the rules does not constitute a valid excuse.
- In the unlikely event that the conduct of both teams requires disciplinary action, the ballot can be cast for a double loss, and tournament leadership should be consulted once the round is completed.
J. Enforcement
For a rule violation, tournament leadership or an adjudication committee as appointed by tournament leadership has overall discretion in all disciplinary matters. Such discretion may include: education of the debaters, requests for behavioral or material changes, reduction of speaker points, overturning a round decision, or disqualification from the tournament.
K. The Audience
Audience members may not give verbal, non-verbal, or written communication to the debaters at any time during the debate round.
2Ballot
- Judge the round based solely upon the issues discussed in the round. Set aside your personal biases and opinions.
- Judges should not independently fact-check the debate.
- Debaters may not introduce new arguments during rebuttal speeches, but may include new evidence, examples, analysis, and analogies offered to support previously introduced lines of argumentation.
- Judicial review is to check the validity of the evidence, not to clarify or add to arguments in the round, and should take no more than 5 minutes.
| Analysis | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Evidence | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Cross-Examination | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Refutation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Delivery | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Organization | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Analysis | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Evidence | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Cross-Examination | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Refutation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Delivery | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Organization | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Analysis | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Evidence | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Cross-Examination | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Refutation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Delivery | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Organization | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Analysis | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Evidence | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Cross-Examination | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Refutation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Delivery | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Organization | 1 2 3 4 5 |
Lincoln Douglas
2026-2027 Season · Last updated August 2026
Lincoln Douglas is value debate. A Lincoln Douglas debate examines competing value systems to answer big questions. The purpose of Lincoln Douglas value debate is to instill in Christian homeschool students the skills of presentation, critical thinking, research, and value analysis. That endeavor is accomplished in an environment of honorable competition that cultivates maturity, wisdom, grace, poise, and brings glory to our Lord Jesus Christ.
1Rules
II. Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Teams
The term ’team’ in Lincoln Douglas Value Debate refers to a single student competing. A Lincoln Douglas Value debate round consists of two teams.
- It is the job of the affirmative team to uphold the resolution. If the affirmative is successful, they win, and the judge should vote for the resolution.
- If the affirmative fails to do so, the negative team wins, and the judge should vote accordingly.
III. The Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Round
Lincoln Douglas Value debate is a discussion of values in the context of the resolution. It primarily concerns what ought to be instead of what is. The judge should place greater weight on philosophical and logical arguments made over specific applications or evidence in deciding on the big picture idea.
A value is a principle by which the validity of the resolution may be examined.
A. Speech Order
Each debate round will consist of the following speeches & time limits, in order:
| Affirmative Constructive (AC) | 6 minutes |
| Cross-Examination of the Affirmative | 3 minutes |
| Negative Constructive (NC) | 7 minutes |
| Cross-Examination of the Negative | 3 minutes |
| 1st Affirmative Rebuttal (1AR) | 4 minutes |
| Negative Rebuttal (NR) | 6 minutes |
| 2nd Affirmative Rebuttal (2AR) | 3 minutes |
B. Speech Purpose
- Constructive speeches may be used to introduce, build, and respond to arguments.
- Rebuttal speeches are used to respond to and extend existing lines of argumentation and to emphasize the most important issues in the round.
- No new lines of argumentation may be presented in rebuttal speeches. Rebuttal speeches may include new evidence, examples, analysis, and analogies offered to support previously introduced lines of argumentation.
- If a team introduces a new line of argumentation into the round during the rebuttals, the judge should disregard these arguments when evaluating the round.
C. Time Limits
- Time begins when the debater begins speaking, both for speeches and cross-examination.
- If a debater fails to use all their time, the remaining time is discarded and cannot be converted into extra time for some other component of the round.
- Once time has expired at the end of a speech or cross-examination, a speaker may be allowed to complete a sentence, but should not start a new thought.
- Once time has expired, judges are free to disregard additional comments or speech content when evaluating the round.
- In the event that debaters are required to self-time, the speaker must set the timer to countdown and to provide an audible alarm when time has expired. The speaker may not turn off the alarm and continue talking.
- During the debate, electronic devices may only be used for timing. They may not be used to send or receive information from any source. A stand-alone calculator is allowed.
D. Cross-Examination
- The cross-examination starts after the completion of each constructive speech.
- Each debater will interrogate once and respond once in the course of the round.
E. Preparation Time
- Each team has a total budget of 4 minutes of preparation time that can be used or discarded as desired by the teams.
- If preparation time is to be taken, it begins after the completion of a speech or cross-examination.
- The budget of the team giving the next speech is charged.
- Preparation time is not allowed directly before cross-examination.
F. Support
- Lincoln-Douglas Debate makes use of a wide variety of support to defend and clarify arguments, which may include (but is not limited to) logic, definitions, quotations, facts, examples, applications, analogies, cited material, and other relevant information.
- Debaters are responsible for all information presented in the round. Misrepresentation or fabrication of articles, authors, sources, or any other information in the round is strictly prohibited.
- Evidence (a subset of support) is the oral verbatim reading of quoted text as well as an accompanying citation from a particular source that is publicly available.
- Evidence must be physically present, on paper, in the debate room, and must include sufficient context to verify the intent of the quote, at a minimum, the complete paragraph from which it is taken.
- The written source citation must include:
- All authors (if available).
- Publication name.
- Complete date (if an internet source does not include a publication date, then the date of the last website update and the date accessed should be included).
- URL (if available).
- Page number, if from a printed source.
- The citation is located directly above or below the quoted text. (If quoting from a book, a bookmark, notecard, or other notation should be used to place the full citation next to the quoted text.)
- Evidence must be read verbatim from the first word of the sentence to the ending punctuation without redaction or addition.
- Information in parentheses may only be orally omitted when it does not change the meaning of the quotation. Information in parentheses must remain within the printed quotation.
- When citing information from a dictionary or legal statute (e.g., U.S. Code, the Constitution), a single clause may be considered a complete sentence.
- A chart, graph, or table may not be displayed, and the data contained in a chart, graph, or table may be used as evidence only by the oral verbatim reading of the labels, values, units, and any accompanying text as they appear in the source. A debater may choose to read the data points deemed relevant to the round, rather than every value, provided the selection does not misrepresent the figure.
- Evidence may not be pieced together from non-contiguous sentences of an article. Non-contiguous sentences from the same article need to either be cited as separate pieces of evidence, or identified orally that sentences or sections were skipped (e.g. “later in the article”).
- Ellipses may not be added by the debater, but may be included if part of the original material.
- Evidence presented by a debater must be consistent with the intent of the source piece.
- Evidence, including adequate context for the evidence, must be made available if requested by the other team or the judge, as the team presenting the evidence has the burden of validating that evidence if challenged.
- When evaluating the round, the judge is free to disregard any evidence presented which is found to be deficient in any aspect described above.
- Judicial Review—if the judge desires to review any evidence presented in the round, this request must wait until the round is over, and must be at the initiative and direction of the judge.
- Judges may review only the evidence debaters read aloud during the round. This review may extend to unread portions when those portions are included to demonstrate the author’s intent.
- Debaters may not extend or explain arguments during the review.
- Debaters may not attempt to provide the judge with evidence before, during, or after the round. Debaters are free to refer orally to the judge’s right to review evidence, both in speeches and in cross-examination.
- Debaters may not display “props” to the judge at any point in the round. A “prop” is defined as an object that substitutes an oral communication with a visual depiction for the perpetuation of a narrative.
G. The Judge
- Stoa acknowledges the judge as the “first line of defense” for all rule infractions, ethical questions, irregularities, and disciplinary issues.
- The judge is at liberty to use all aspects of the round to reach a conclusion regarding the ballot.
- In confusing or flagrant situations, the judge should seek guidance from the judge orientation staff or tournament leadership.
- If manipulation, misrepresentation, fabrication of evidence, or gross negligence under evidence rules is suspected, it should be brought to the attention of tournament leadership once the round is completed.
- Ignorance of the rules does not constitute a valid excuse.
- In the unlikely event that the conduct of both teams requires disciplinary action, the ballot can be cast for a double loss, and tournament leadership should be consulted once the round is completed.
H. Enforcement
For a rule violation, tournament leadership or an adjudication committee as appointed by tournament leadership has overall discretion in all disciplinary matters. Such discretion may include: education of the debaters, requests for behavioral or material changes, reduction of speaker points, overturning a round decision, or disqualification from the tournament.
I. The Audience
Audience members may not give verbal, non-verbal, or written communication to the debaters at any time during the debate round.
2Ballot
- Judge the round based solely upon the issues discussed in the round. Set aside your personal biases and opinions.
- Judges should not independently fact-check the debate.
- Debaters may not introduce new arguments during rebuttal speeches, but may include new evidence, examples, analysis, and analogies offered to support previously introduced lines of argumentation.
- Judicial review is to check the validity of the evidence, not to clarify or add to arguments in the round, and should take no more than 5 minutes.
| Value Argumentation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Support | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Cross-Examination | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Refutation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Delivery | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Organization | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Value Argumentation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Support | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Cross-Examination | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Refutation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Delivery | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Organization | 1 2 3 4 5 |
Parliamentary
2026-2027 Season · Last updated August 2026
Parliamentary debate is an advanced form of debate that is extemporaneous in nature with rotating topics. Parliamentary debate asks competitors to develop and defend ideas and positions on a wide range of issues. The purpose of Parliamentary debate is to instill in Christian homeschool students the skills of presentation, critical thinking, reasoning, and analysis of various issues. That endeavor is accomplished in an environment of honorable competition that cultivates maturity, wisdom, grace, poise, and brings glory to our Lord Jesus Christ.
1Rules
II. Parliamentary Debate Team Eligibility
Each debater must have reached age sixteen (16) by October 1st of the competition year, or have competed for two or more years in another debate format, or receive consent from her/his coach. A parliamentary debate team consists of two competitors. A team may not switch partners within a single tournament.
III. Parliamentary Debate Teams and Objectives
- The Parliamentary debate round consists of two teams.
- The Government team is comprised of the Prime Minister and Member of Government.
- The Opposition team is comprised of the Leader of Opposition and Member of Opposition.
- The Government team shall affirm the resolution.
IV. Resolution Announcement and Preparation Time
- The resolution shall be announced at a specified time before each round.
- The official start of preparation time shall be announced with the topic.
- Once the resolution has been announced, each team will have twenty (20) minutes to prepare for the debate and walk to their competition room.
- Debaters are responsible for monitoring their preparation time and should arrive promptly in their event room before the allotted preparation time has expired.
- Competitors may prepare using whatever resources they have available during preparation time, including electronic devices, unless otherwise indicated by tournament leadership.
V. During the Debate
A. Speech Order
Speeches shall proceed in the following order with the indicated maximum speech times:
| Prime Minister Constructive | 7 minutes |
| Leader of Opposition Constructive | 7 minutes |
| Member of Government Constructive | 7 minutes |
| Member of Opposition Constructive | 7 minutes |
| Leader of Opposition Rebuttal | 5 minutes |
| Prime Minister Rebuttal | 5 minutes |
B. Constructive and Rebuttal Speeches
- The Prime Minister shall state the resolution during the first speech.
- Debaters may introduce new arguments during all constructive speeches.
- No new lines of argumentation may be presented in rebuttal speeches. Rebuttal speeches may include new examples, analysis, and analogies offered to support or refute previously introduced lines of argumentation.
C. Use of Information
- Parliamentary debate is unique among debate formats in that it accepts the voice of the debater as an authority on the subject being debated. The use of information in Parliamentary debate is not equivalent to evidentiary debate as in Team Policy. All types of support are treated equally in the Parliamentary round.
- Parliamentary Debate makes use of a wide variety of support to defend and clarify arguments, which may include (but is not limited to) logic, definitions, facts, examples, applications, analogies, and other relevant information.
- Information utilized in the round is to be within the realm of knowledge of educated and informed citizens.
- Judges may disallow overly specific information.
- Debaters are responsible for all information presented in the round. Fabrication of information is strictly prohibited.
- No materials may be brought into the debate round for a debate team’s use except those handwritten by the two debaters during preparation time, a printed copy of the resolution if provided by tournament leadership, and a copy of the Stoa Parliamentary Rules.
- Debaters may not display “props” to the judge at any point in the round. A “prop” is defined as an object that substitutes an oral communication with a visual depiction.
- During the debate, electronic devices may only be used for timing. They may not be used to send or receive information from any source. A stand-alone calculator is allowed.
D. Points of Information
- An opponent may request a point of information—orally, by rising, or by raising a hand or other similar attention-grabber—at any time after the first minute and before the last minute of any constructive speech. All other points of information are out of order.
- No points of information will be allowed in rebuttals.
- The debater holding the floor has the discretion to accept or refuse points of information, and interact with the point as desired.
- The speaking time of the debater with the floor continues during the point of information exchange.
- A point of information may be phrased as a concise question or a statement.
- Any follow-up question or statement by the opponent should be considered a new point of information.
E. Points of Order
A point of order is a serious charge and should not be raised for minor violations.
- How to Initiate: If at any time, a debater believes that his or her opponent has violated a rule, the debater shall orally state “Point of Order” and any speech time in progress shall pause for the exchange. The debater must state and explain the rule violation.
- How to Respond: The other team must yield the floor if a speech is in progress and may make a brief response that may:
- Agree that something is out of order; or
- Disagree, and briefly explain why.
- How to Facilitate as Judge:
- After the exchange, the judge has discretion and may respond. An example of each of the three types of responses are below:
- Point Well Taken / I Agree / That was Out of Order
- Point Not Well Taken / I Disagree / That was In Order
- Point Under Consideration / I am Not Sure / I’ll have to Think About it.
- If there is a panel of judges, after the debater briefly explains the point of order and their opponent briefly replies, the panel may either (1) take a vote on the objection, or (2) inform the debaters that the panel will take the point of order under consideration and the round shall continue.
- After the exchange, the judge has discretion and may respond. An example of each of the three types of responses are below:
- The speaking time of the debater with the floor stops during the Point of Order exchange.
F. Indicators of Agreement
- Judges, observers, and debaters may indicate agreement with the speaker through gestures or audible acknowledgment.
- Agreement indicators must neither interrupt the speaker nor cause undue distraction to the judge.
- The judge shall exercise personal discretion and may ask audience members to limit or stop their signs of support, and to leave if they do not comply.
- Audience members may not give verbal, non-verbal, or written communication to the debaters at any time during the debate round.
G. The Judge
- Stoa acknowledges the judge as the “first line of defense” for all rule infractions, ethical questions, irregularities, and disciplinary issues.
- The judge is at liberty to use all aspects of the round to reach a conclusion regarding the ballot.
- In confusing or flagrant situations, the judge should seek guidance from the judge orientation staff or tournament leadership.
- If manipulation, misrepresentation, fabrication of evidence, or gross negligence under evidence rules is suspected, it should be brought to the attention of tournament leadership once the round is completed.
- Ignorance of the rules does not constitute a valid excuse.
- In the unlikely event that the conduct of both teams requires disciplinary action, the ballot may be cast for a double loss, tournament leadership should be consulted once the round is completed.
H. Enforcement
For a rule violation, tournament leadership or an adjudication committee as appointed by tournament leadership has overall discretion in all disciplinary matters. Such discretion may include: education of the debaters, the request of behavioral or material changes, reduction of speaker points, overturn of a round decision, or disqualification from the tournament.
2Ballot
- Judge the round based solely upon the issues discussed in the round. Set aside your personal biases and opinions.
- Information utilized by the debaters in the round should be within the realm of knowledge of educated and informed citizens.
- Debaters may not introduce new arguments during rebuttal speeches, but may include new evidence, examples, analysis, and analogies offered to support previously introduced lines of argumentation.
| Professionalism | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Support | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Analysis | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Refutation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Delivery | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Organization | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Professionalism | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Support | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Analysis | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Refutation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Delivery | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Organization | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Professionalism | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Support | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Analysis | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Refutation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Delivery | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Organization | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Professionalism | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Support | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Analysis | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Refutation | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Delivery | 1 2 3 4 5 |
| Organization | 1 2 3 4 5 |
Philosophy of Evidence Standards
2026-2027 Season · Current as of August 2026
A Philosophy of Evidence Ethics
Perhaps the greatest potential for ethical failure in the debate activity arises in the use of the quoted word or what we traditionally call “evidence”.
We can subdivide (or classify) all of a debater’s speech into two broad categories: 1) the student’s own words and; 2) the words of others. A competitor, using his own words, is granted considerable leeway in the use of these words because the thoughts and words are his and the responsibility and consequences of these words is his as well. A speaker’s words are the property of the speaker—as is the responsibility for those words. If a speaker speaks in error, the speaker alone bears the responsibility for the error, but when a speaker speaks on behalf of someone else, they place another person’s reputation at stake.
An ecclesiastic model…
Some of our students may become pastors, elders, teachers or even Bible translators. To quote, teach or translate the word of God is a tremendous responsibility and one that all Christians should take very seriously. We are training many of our students for these monumental tasks. If speech and debate allows (or even trains) them to play fast and loose with their quoted evidence, what can we expect when they move on to bigger things? How reliably will they translate scripture? How tempted will they be to misquote scripture to make a point in an article or a sermon?
A courtroom model…
Evidence, when read into a debate round, is akin to calling a witness to the dock in a courtroom. The author of the quoted evidence becomes a witness who is testifying in our debate round. The witness may be attesting to a matter of fact or he may be providing his expert opinion on a subject. To misrepresent the words or intent of the witness in a court of law is “tampering” with a witness and this carries considerable legal consequences. Some of our students will pursue legal careers. If our students develop unethical practices in high school debate, how can we expect them to overcome these bad habits learned in this preparatory activity?
For these and a host of other reasons, our students must learn and practice honest and ethical use of the quoted word.
Why is evidence handling an important issue?
1) It reveals the heart
A student who intentionally misuses evidence is placing competitive success ahead of integrity and justice. This is a spiritual problem that should be identified and corrected. A student who intentionally misuses evidence either has, or will have, other ethical and heart issues. It is always best to identify personality and spiritual weaknesses early in life so they can be overcome before they expand.
There can be a heart issue even if a student is not misusing evidence, but is avoiding full accountability. This failure to submit to standards of accountability and/or to the accountability of others demonstrates pride and a dangerous overconfidence.
2) It establishes a pattern for life
It is easy to say or think, “I will take a ‘shortcut’ now, but later in life, when it really matters, I will be completely upright”. The truth of the matter is that the practice of sin dulls us to other sins. The Lord may deal with our hardness of heart in “small things” and judge us with greater hardness of heart in the “bigger” things. This is one of the many reasons why, there are no “small things” and this is a prime reason why we must teach uprightness at the outset of every activity.
3) It can be a positive or a negative witness to the world
The world is watching—even when we are unaware. If our students are a bad witness for Christ, then all of our labors are in vain. Of course our primary audience is our Lord for whom we should always try to be beyond reproach.
4) It is a matter of biblical principle
Do not bear false witness. If a student alters or misrepresents evidence, the student is giving a false testimony of what that author actually said or intended. The ninth commandment is explicitly clear in its prohibition of this practice. (Exodus 20:16 & Deuteronomy 5:20)
Do not steal. If we use unethical means to achieve a benefit, we are essentially stealing that benefit. This is especially true in the forensic world because the ill-gained success comes at the expense of another competitor or competitors. (Exodus 20:15 & Deuteronomy 5:19)
Treat others as we wish to be treated. Would any student want their opponent to alter or misrepresent evidence in an attempt to defeat them in competition? Probably not. Therefore our students should follow the Lord’s golden rule. “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” (Luke 6:31, NIV)
We should act justly. What does the Lord require of us? To do justice. “He has shown you, O man, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” (Micah 6:8, NIV)
- If I misrepresent evidence, am I acting justly?
- If, through my deceit, I defeat an honest opponent, am I loving mercy?
- If I attempt to elevate myself in the tournament results through dishonesty, am I walking humbly?
Why do we need evidence standards?
- The existence of an evidence standards document communicates the importance of evidence handling to the members of our organization.
- Evidence standards provide a path to some degree of evidence uniformity in our organization.
- A standards document helps honest competitors avoid ethical breaches and even the appearance of ethical breaches.
- Evidence standards can be a deterrent to those who might be tempted to cheat.
- Evidence standards aid our community in achieving accountability.
Steps for maintaining ethical practice in this area
As a Christian organization, we need regular and ongoing efforts to direct all of our participants (coaches, parents, students, and judges) toward a distinctively Christian vision of our activities. We all need to study, consider, and discuss both the principles and the application of how we engage in forensic activities. To these goals, we must be devoted and purposeful. We must have both formal and informal education of students, parents, coaches, and as much as possible, judges.
Each of these groups has different educational needs. It is not possible to fully educate a community judge in all of the issues of evidence handling during a 30-minute orientation. For this group a few basic pointers are all that can be taught in a single orientation. Coaches and parents, on the other hand, need training in evidence ethics (and other issues) that is comprehensive and broad.
Levels of accountability and oversight
As a Christian organization, we have all tools and structures that we need to properly address these matters. With the guidance and oversight of coaches, parents, judges and peers we can adequately deal with these issues. The following is a list of the tools that are already available to us.
- Education of our students (appeal to the head)
- Motivation of our students to embrace high standards (appeal to the heart)
- Oversight of parents
- Oversight of partner
- Oversight of coach
- Oversight of opponents
- Oversight of judge
- Oversight of the broad community (Those observing a debate round, including tournament personnel, other clubs, etc.)
These tools will only promote high ethical standards if we choose to use them for this purpose.
The two extremes to be avoided
In our desire to develop good evidence handling and strong ethics, it is possible to error in several different directions. We can be naïve, apathetic, or inactive on these issues with the result that ethical failings will gradually become more prevalent. This is a great disservice to our students. Or we can become so obsessed with the matter that we look for a fault behind every bush with the result that we make the activity miserable for everyone and drive our student’s hearts in the wrong direction.
We must remember that ethical failures in the handling of evidence can be inadvertent or intentional. As parents and coaches, we need to guard against the dangerous emotions of frustration and anger relating to these issues. We would do well to remember that our students are sinners (not much different from us) and that life for the believer is a process of sanctification. If we observe ethical failures, we should verify, assess motive, consult with wise counselors, stay calm, and then address the issue with appropriate grace.
We should also remember that the greatest majority of evidence handling failures are not an intentional effort to cheat but are the result of inadequate instruction, carelessness, or haste.
Evidence Standards
The following document outlines four different sets of standards:
- Qualification Standards help us determine when to give certain words the additional weight of “evidence”. How do we know when we have gone beyond the words and opinions of the debater to the words and opinions of an expert?
- Source Standards help us avoid the pitfalls of misrepresenting a source or of misrepresenting the credibility of a source.
- Extraction and Editing Standards help us in our efforts to be faithful to the original words and intent of the author.
- Oral Presentation – Best Practices help us to properly represent our evidence in our oral communication.
Qualification Standards
Introduction to qualification standards
These standards are not intended to measure the credibility or weightiness of a piece of evidence. Instead, these standards are intended to identify a set of minimal criteria to determine whether the “evidence” is really evidence. (Should the words attributed to a particular source be given greater value than the debater’s opinion?)
Just because quoted material meets the standards presented in this document does not mean that the claim in the evidence is true nor does it make the evidence beyond challenge by an opponent. All evidence does not carry equal weight in the debate round. A multitude of factors including source credibility, recency, and even grammar will give some pieces of evidence more weight or consideration in a debate round than others. The qualification standards in this section are intended to suggest minimum requirements for when material is given more consideration than the opinion of the debater.
These standards have several goals/purposes:
- To create tests to determine if something spoken in a debate round is really evidence or rather just the opinion of the speaker.
- To accurately and fairly represent the ideas of others
- To minimize ethical infractions
- To maximize accountability
1) The source should be in the public domain
The evidence should come from a source that is published and available to the general public. Public domain sources may come with a cost or they may be free. The existence of a subscription cost or other fees for access does not take a source out of the public domain.
Public domain sources include: books, newspapers, magazines, professional journals, government documents and all published material. Articles and content from Internet web pages are also considered “public domain”.
Unpublished quoted material from personal correspondence is not considered public domain and is not classified as evidence in the debate round.
Justification for the standard: This standard enhances accountability. If the source document is not publically available, it is difficult or impossible to verify the evidence or the source of the evidence.
2) The source and the evidence should be in textual (printed or written) form
This standard applies to the original source and to the presence of the evidence in the round.
The original source should be in text form (either printed or electronic). Video and audio presentations do not meet this standard. However if a textual transcription of the audio is published, this published text qualifies as evidence. Some television and radio programs post transcripts of their programs on their web sites and this meets the standard.
A news service’s transcript of the President’s State of the Union Address meets this standard, but the debater’s own transcription from the television broadcast does not.
The evidence in the round should also be in written or printed form. All evidence used in the round should be physically present on paper. Audio or video recordings should not be played in the round, but even if they were, they would fail this standard. Memorized evidence that is not available on paper in the round does not meet this standard because it cannot be handed to an opposing team or judge for analysis and review.
Justification for the standard: This standard gives the greatest assurance of an accurate relay of the precise words of the author.
3) Evidence should have a complete source citation
The most important factor underlying this standard is that there should be sufficient information to enable someone else to easily retrieve the evidence. Any source citation that fails this test should disqualify the evidence. Beyond this, the following components should be included in every source citation.
A complete source citation should include: All Authors; Name of publication; Complete Date (if an internet source does not include a publication date, then the date of the last website update and the date accessed should be included); Page number (if from a book or large document).
If the evidence is from an electronic source (Internet), the citation should also include: The complete URL (or other source locator); Access date. The citation should be located directly above or below the quoted text.
Evidence has very little value unless the author or the source of the quotation has qualifications. Debaters should be diligent to include these qualifications in their source.
In some instances, a published article may not provide the name of the author. In this event, the citation should note that no author name is available. This may include a statement like: “no author provided”. It is also possible that some published material may not include a publication date. In this situation, the citation should include a statement like: “no publication date available”.
When quoting evidence in a debate round, it is not necessary to read the complete source citation, but the complete citation must be on the evidence card or the brief.
Justification for the standard: A complete source citation aids in the accountability and verification of the evidence. A complete source citation aids in the in-round evaluation of evidence. This may help to answer questions like: Who wrote this? Who published this? Is this a peer-reviewed publication? Does this author or publication have any biases?
4) Evidence should be read verbatim in the round
A paraphrase (or summary) is not the same as a quotation. The opponent, the judge, and the audience in a debate round all need to hear the precise words of the author of the quotation. The debater is free to analyze, paraphrase, explain, or summarize their evidence before or after it is read. But unless the quotation is read verbatim, it does not carry the weight of evidence.
Justification for the standard: There are several reasons for this standard. First, even a well-meaning debater cannot help but to infuse his or her own perspective and biases into their paraphrase of the evidence. This alters the message of the evidence and may give it greater strength that it deserves. Second, this practice modifies the author’s words without his consent. Third, if paraphrasing were to replace the verbatim reading of evidence, teams would have to ask for, and inspect, every piece of their opponent’s evidence because paraphrasing may hide weaknesses in the evidence. Fourth, paraphrasing introduces two versions of the evidence into the round: the spoken version and the paper version.
Source Standards
The following should be avoided:
- Quoting from a blog unless it is written by an author who is an expert in the topic area.
- Quoting from web pages where the author is a student with less than a bachelor’s degree.
- Quoting anything that the student or the student’s friends wrote
Justification for the standard: The Internet allows anyone to become a published author. If we are not careful, our high school debaters may find themselves citing information that is clearly not credible or reliable. These standards also aid in accountability by preventing a student from creating their own quotable content.
Extraction and Editing Standards
The debater is responsible for any textual omission or textual addition. In the event that the judge feels that a debater’s editing of evidence alters the intent, magnitude, or credibility of the evidence, the judge is free to discipline this improper editing by issuing a loss to the offending team.
Quotations from different sources should never be merged into one piece of evidence.
Debate evidence must be extracted from the original source document with extreme care. Once extracted, evidence needs to quote from the first word of a sentence to an ending punctuation without omission or addition. Ellipsis, gray-out, strike-through or other indicators of omission should not be used. The portion of the original text that is extracted as evidence must not alter the meaning or intent of the author.
Non-contiguous quotations from the same document should not be merged into one piece of evidence.
If evidence is placed on a page with content that is not evidence (as one would do in a 1AC or in a brief), the formatting of the page must clearly differentiate the evidence from the non-evidence. This can be accomplished by the use of quotation marks or the more common practice of double indentation of the quoted material.
In addition to the standards presented above, it is the responsibility of the debater to assure that their evidence accurately reflects the intent of the original document. The student should:
- …handle evidence as if the author of the source document will be your judge every time you read the card.
- …handle evidence in such a manner that your opponent would consent to the way you pulled it
- …handle evidence according to established debate norms
Oral Presentation of Evidence
Best practices of delivery: maintaining ethics and accountability in the delivery of evidence
Properly placing evidence on paper is only half of the battle. It is possible for evidence to be properly extracted from a source document and properly recorded on the debater’s card or brief, but to deliver it in a deceptive way in the round.
Here are some examples of possible abuses:
- A student reads only selected portions of a piece of evidence, leaving out troublesome or clarifying words or phrases.
- A student orally embellishes the evidence by adding words during the reading of evidence
- After reading a quotation, a student goes right into their own analysis in an attempt to make their analysis appear as part of the evidence.
In each of the cases described above, a review of the physical evidence may find that it meets all evidence standards, but the oral presentation did not accurately reflect the printed evidence. In other words, the printed quotation was accurate, but the spoken quotation was erroneous.
One of our prime objectives should be to communicate quoted material (evidence) accurately and clearly to the audience. Since quoted material is likely to be given more weight than the speaker’s opinion, we want to adopt practices that effectively communicate to the audience precisely what is on the card or brief. The task of accurately distinguishing the quoted word from the non-quoted word is easier to achieve when we use the written word. Quotation marks and double indentations, when properly used, make this distinction abundantly clear in the printed word. This task is far more difficult when we set our pens and paper aside and choose to employ the spoken word.
It is, of course, possible to say, “quote” and “end quote” at the beginning and end of each piece of evidence, but this practice becomes annoying to an audience—especially if there is much cited evidence. (Although we may not want to rely on saying “quote” and “end quote” as a matter of standard practice, it can be a useful tool, if used sparingly, to clarify a particularly difficult quotation or an awkward verbal transition.)
Because of the difficulty of this task of accurate oral use of evidence, coaches and parents should exert extra energy into coaching this area of the activity. Orally communicating the quoted word is a difficult task requiring a variety of more nuanced approaches. Here are some useful techniques for achieving our goal.
1) The source should precede the quotation
This has been the norm in academic debate for decades—and with good reason. The citation of a source before reading the quotation accomplishes several objectives. First, it tells the audience that quoted material is to follow. This substitutes for saying, “quote” at the beginning of each piece of evidence. Second, by knowing the identity and qualifications of the source prior to the reading of the evidence, the audience can evaluate the author’s words in light of the credibility or reputation of the author.
There is one noteworthy exception to this standard and it relates to quotations used to open a speech. In some instances, the speaker may want to achieve a dramatic effect by opening a speech with the words of someone else (quoted words) and not reveal the source until after the conclusion of the quotation.
2) Go right from the source to the quotation
Generally, the speaker should not place their own words between the reading of the source and the reading of the quotation. Any non-quoted material that might be spoken before the quotation can too easily be mistaken for the words of the quoted source.
3) Use verbal techniques to indicate the end of the quoted material
These might include a slight pause, a change of voice tone or inflection, or an alteration of delivery speed.
4) Use nonverbal indicators to indicate the end of the quoted material
This is easily achieved through the debater’s physical handling of their evidence. If the student is reading from a card or a brief, there will usually be less eye contact with the judge while reading the quotation. When the debater is finished reading the evidence, they will usually resume normal eye contact with the audience and the physical card or brief will be repositioned in some manner.
Beyond the Letter of the Law
With regard to the use of evidence in a debate round, our goal should be to go beyond the letter of the law and to seek to embrace its spirit. We want to accurately convey the ideas of others; we want to hold ourselves accountable; we want to follow established norms for evidence; and we want to orally communicate to our audience what we have carefully placed on paper. Looking at the big picture, we want to avoid the temptation to place winning ahead of our ethical treatment, and delivery, of evidence.